Second Deposit LDP
Search representations
Results for Evans Banks Planning Limited search
New searchObject
Second Deposit LDP
PrC1/h4
Representation ID: 5173
Received: 12/04/2023
Respondent ID: 4967
Respondent: Evans Banks Planning Limited
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
An objection is made to the allocation for residential development at Land off Parc y Delyn (LDP Ref. No. PrC1/h4). It is considered that its continued inclusion will lead to the Plan failing the 3 Tests of Soundness.
An adoptable road to serve the site would be impossible, which in itself would question its deliverability.
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
SuV4/h1
Representation ID: 5174
Received: 12/04/2023
Respondent ID: 4967
Respondent: Evans Banks Planning Limited
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
In summary, we object to the inclusion of the allocation in question (in Bronwydd) on the basis of the above and that its inclusion within the Plan would result in the document being ‘unsound’.
We therefore respectfully request that this Representation be given careful examination, and that the allocation be removed to ensure that the document passes all the relevant tests of soundness.
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
SuV12/h1
Representation ID: 5175
Received: 12/04/2023
Respondent ID: 4967
Respondent: Evans Banks Planning Limited
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
An objection is made to the inclusion of the site, the main reason is the lack of delivery during the time the site has been allocated in the current LDP. The allocation should be removed to ensure that the document passes all the relevant tests of soundness.
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
PrC2/h16
Representation ID: 5176
Received: 12/04/2023
Respondent ID: 4967
Respondent: Evans Banks Planning Limited
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
In summary, we object to the inclusion of the allocation in question on the basis of the above and that its inclusion within the Plan would result in the document being ‘unsound’.
Despite having almost 20 years of support for the principle of residential development at the historic allocation from the Council, not a single housing unit has been delivered to date. No evidence has been presented to demonstrate a change in circumstances to indicate the allocation will now be deliverable and so its continued allocation would lead to the plan being deemed unsound on this basis.
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared
Object
Second Deposit LDP
SeC7/h1
Representation ID: 5179
Received: 12/04/2023
Respondent ID: 4967
Respondent: Evans Banks Planning Limited
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Objection to the inclusion of allocation SeC7/h1 in Llangennech.
Despite having almost 10 years of support for the principle of residential development at the historic allocation from the Council, not a single housing unit has been delivered to date. Its inclusion within the Plan would result in the document being ‘unsound’.
We therefore respectfully request that this Representation be given careful examination, and that the allocation be removed to ensure that the document passes all the relevant tests of soundness.
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
SeC7/h3
Representation ID: 5180
Received: 12/04/2023
Respondent ID: 4967
Respondent: Evans Banks Planning Limited
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
In summary, we object to the inclusion of the allocation in question on the basis of the above and that its inclusion within the Plan would result in the document being ‘unsound’.
We therefore respectfully request that this Representation be given careful examination, and that the allocation be removed to ensure that the document passes all the relevant tests of soundness.
The allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
PrC3/h4
Representation ID: 5181
Received: 12/04/2023
Respondent ID: 4967
Respondent: Evans Banks Planning Limited
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
In summary, we object to the inclusion of the allocation in question on the basis of the above and that its inclusion within the Plan would result in the document being ‘unsound.’
We therefore respectfully request that this Representation be given careful examination, and that the allocation be removed to ensure that the document passes all the relevant tests of soundness.
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
SeC9/h2
Representation ID: 5183
Received: 12/04/2023
Respondent ID: 4967
Respondent: Evans Banks Planning Limited
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Objection to housing allocation SeC9/h2 in Brynamman.
As of yet no planning application regarding residential development have been submitted at the site and therefore not a single housing unit has been delivered to date. This in turn, questions its deliverability and reliability as a housing allocation.
We therefore respectfully request that this Representation be given careful examination, and that the allocation be removed to ensure that the document passes all the relevant tests of soundness.
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
SeC12/h1
Representation ID: 5184
Received: 12/04/2023
Respondent ID: 4967
Respondent: Evans Banks Planning Limited
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
In summary, we object to the inclusion of the allocation in question on the basis of the above and that its inclusion within the Plan would result in the document being ‘unsound’.
We therefore respectfully request that this Representation be given careful examination, and that the allocation be removed to ensure that the document passes all the relevant tests of soundness.
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
SeC12/h3
Representation ID: 5185
Received: 12/04/2023
Respondent ID: 4967
Respondent: Evans Banks Planning Limited
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Object to the inclusion of the allocation and that its inclusion within the Plan would result in the document being ‘unsound’ as it is unable to deliver housing and has been rolled forward without due consideration. The site has been allocated for 10 years with no planning application submitted.
We therefore respectfully request that this Representation be given careful examination, and that the allocation be removed to ensure that the document passes all the relevant tests of soundness.
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.