Second Deposit LDP

Search representations

Results for Evans Banks Planning Limited search

New search New search

Object

Second Deposit LDP

PrC1/h4

Representation ID: 5173

Received: 12/04/2023

Respondent ID: 4967

Respondent: Evans Banks Planning Limited

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

An objection is made to the allocation for residential development at Land off Parc y Delyn (LDP Ref. No. PrC1/h4). It is considered that its continued inclusion will lead to the Plan failing the 3 Tests of Soundness.
An adoptable road to serve the site would be impossible, which in itself would question its deliverability.


Our response:

Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.

Object

Second Deposit LDP

SuV4/h1

Representation ID: 5174

Received: 12/04/2023

Respondent ID: 4967

Respondent: Evans Banks Planning Limited

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

In summary, we object to the inclusion of the allocation in question (in Bronwydd) on the basis of the above and that its inclusion within the Plan would result in the document being ‘unsound’.
We therefore respectfully request that this Representation be given careful examination, and that the allocation be removed to ensure that the document passes all the relevant tests of soundness.


Our response:

Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.

Object

Second Deposit LDP

SuV12/h1

Representation ID: 5175

Received: 12/04/2023

Respondent ID: 4967

Respondent: Evans Banks Planning Limited

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

An objection is made to the inclusion of the site, the main reason is the lack of delivery during the time the site has been allocated in the current LDP. The allocation should be removed to ensure that the document passes all the relevant tests of soundness.


Our response:

Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.

Object

Second Deposit LDP

PrC2/h16

Representation ID: 5176

Received: 12/04/2023

Respondent ID: 4967

Respondent: Evans Banks Planning Limited

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

In summary, we object to the inclusion of the allocation in question on the basis of the above and that its inclusion within the Plan would result in the document being ‘unsound’.

Despite having almost 20 years of support for the principle of residential development at the historic allocation from the Council, not a single housing unit has been delivered to date. No evidence has been presented to demonstrate a change in circumstances to indicate the allocation will now be deliverable and so its continued allocation would lead to the plan being deemed unsound on this basis.


Our response:

Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared

Object

Second Deposit LDP

SeC7/h1

Representation ID: 5179

Received: 12/04/2023

Respondent ID: 4967

Respondent: Evans Banks Planning Limited

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

Objection to the inclusion of allocation SeC7/h1 in Llangennech.
Despite having almost 10 years of support for the principle of residential development at the historic allocation from the Council, not a single housing unit has been delivered to date. Its inclusion within the Plan would result in the document being ‘unsound’.

We therefore respectfully request that this Representation be given careful examination, and that the allocation be removed to ensure that the document passes all the relevant tests of soundness.


Our response:

Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.

Object

Second Deposit LDP

SeC7/h3

Representation ID: 5180

Received: 12/04/2023

Respondent ID: 4967

Respondent: Evans Banks Planning Limited

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

In summary, we object to the inclusion of the allocation in question on the basis of the above and that its inclusion within the Plan would result in the document being ‘unsound’.
We therefore respectfully request that this Representation be given careful examination, and that the allocation be removed to ensure that the document passes all the relevant tests of soundness.


Our response:

The allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.

Object

Second Deposit LDP

PrC3/h4

Representation ID: 5181

Received: 12/04/2023

Respondent ID: 4967

Respondent: Evans Banks Planning Limited

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

In summary, we object to the inclusion of the allocation in question on the basis of the above and that its inclusion within the Plan would result in the document being ‘unsound.’
We therefore respectfully request that this Representation be given careful examination, and that the allocation be removed to ensure that the document passes all the relevant tests of soundness.


Our response:

Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.

Object

Second Deposit LDP

SeC9/h2

Representation ID: 5183

Received: 12/04/2023

Respondent ID: 4967

Respondent: Evans Banks Planning Limited

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

Objection to housing allocation SeC9/h2 in Brynamman.

As of yet no planning application regarding residential development have been submitted at the site and therefore not a single housing unit has been delivered to date. This in turn, questions its deliverability and reliability as a housing allocation.

We therefore respectfully request that this Representation be given careful examination, and that the allocation be removed to ensure that the document passes all the relevant tests of soundness.


Our response:

Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.

Object

Second Deposit LDP

SeC12/h1

Representation ID: 5184

Received: 12/04/2023

Respondent ID: 4967

Respondent: Evans Banks Planning Limited

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

In summary, we object to the inclusion of the allocation in question on the basis of the above and that its inclusion within the Plan would result in the document being ‘unsound’.
We therefore respectfully request that this Representation be given careful examination, and that the allocation be removed to ensure that the document passes all the relevant tests of soundness.


Our response:

Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.

Object

Second Deposit LDP

SeC12/h3

Representation ID: 5185

Received: 12/04/2023

Respondent ID: 4967

Respondent: Evans Banks Planning Limited

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

Object to the inclusion of the allocation and that its inclusion within the Plan would result in the document being ‘unsound’ as it is unable to deliver housing and has been rolled forward without due consideration. The site has been allocated for 10 years with no planning application submitted.
We therefore respectfully request that this Representation be given careful examination, and that the allocation be removed to ensure that the document passes all the relevant tests of soundness.


Our response:

Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.