Second Deposit LDP

Search representations

Results for Evans Banks Planning Limited search

New search New search

Object

Second Deposit LDP

PrC3/h36

Representation ID: 5062

Received: 12/04/2023

Respondent ID: 4967

Respondent: Evans Banks Planning Limited

Agent: Evans Banks Planning Limited

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

In summary, we object to the inclusion of the allocation in question on the basis of the above and that its inclusion within the Plan would result in the document being ‘unsound’.

We therefore respectfully request that this Representation be given careful examination, and that the allocation be removed to ensure that the document passes all the relevant tests of soundness.

Attachments:


Our response:

Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.

Object

Second Deposit LDP

PrC3/h22

Representation ID: 5064

Received: 12/04/2023

Respondent ID: 4967

Respondent: Evans Banks Planning Limited

Agent: Evans Banks Planning Limited

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

Objection to housing allocation PrC3/h22 under policy HOM1:
It is considered that the continued inclusion of this allocation will lead to the Plan failing the 3 Tests of Soundness for the reasons set out in the supporting statement, namely:
Test 1 - The allocation fails the test of soundness as its inability to be delivered is in conflict with Paragraph 4.2.2 of Planning Policy Wales (Edition 11).
Test 2 - The allocation fails the test of soundness as its inability to be delivered would fail to address key issues set out by the Plan (housing supply).
Test 3 - The allocation fails to test the soundness as the site is clearly unable to deliver any new housing.

Attachments:


Our response:

Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.

Object

Second Deposit LDP

PrC3/h14

Representation ID: 5067

Received: 12/04/2023

Respondent ID: 4967

Respondent: Evans Banks Planning Limited

Agent: Evans Banks Planning Limited

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

Objection to housing allocation PrC13/h4 under policy HOM1:
It is considered that the continued inclusion of this allocation will lead to the Plan failing the 3 Tests of Soundness for the reasons set out in the supporting statement, namely:
Test 1 - The allocation fails the test of soundness as its inability to be delivered is in conflict with Paragraph 4.2.2 of Planning Policy Wales (Edition 11).
Test 2 - The allocation fails the test of soundness as its inability to be delivered would fail to address key issues set out by the Plan (housing supply).
Test 3 - The allocation fails to test the soundness as the site is clearly unable to deliver any new housing.

Attachments:


Our response:

Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.

Object

Second Deposit LDP

SuV23/h2

Representation ID: 5071

Received: 12/04/2023

Respondent ID: 4967

Respondent: Evans Banks Planning Limited

Agent: Evans Banks Planning Limited

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

Site SuV23/h2 – The Council considers that the site is deliverable for the purposes of 25 houses, although it is unclear on what basis this conclusion has been made.

No evidence has been presented to demonstrate a change in circumstances to indicate the allocation will now be deliverable and so its continued allocation would lead to the plan being deemed unsound on this basis.

Attachments:


Our response:

Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.

Object

Second Deposit LDP

SeC1/h4

Representation ID: 5076

Received: 12/04/2023

Respondent ID: 4967

Respondent: Evans Banks Planning Limited

Agent: Evans Banks Planning Limited

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

The proposed allocation in Pontyates has been fully assessed and in considering its context and background (summarised below) it is considered that its continued inclusion will lead to the Plan failing the 3 Tests of Soundness

Despite having almost 10 years of support for the principle of residential development at the historic allocation from the Council, not a single housing unit has been delivered to date. The Council’s decision to allocate the land appears to not have been done so on credible or robust evidence.

Attachments:


Our response:

The allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared

Object

Second Deposit LDP

SeC18/h1

Representation ID: 5090

Received: 12/04/2023

Respondent ID: 4967

Respondent: Evans Banks Planning Limited

Agent: Evans Banks Planning Limited

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

We object to the inclusion of the allocation in question on the basis of the above and that its inclusion within the Plan would result in the document being ‘unsound’.

We therefore respectfully request that this Representation be given careful examination, and that the allocation be removed to ensure that the document passes all the relevant tests of soundness.

Attachments:


Our response:

Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.

Object

Second Deposit LDP

SeC18/h3

Representation ID: 5098

Received: 12/04/2023

Respondent ID: 4967

Respondent: Evans Banks Planning Limited

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

Objection to housing allocation SeC18/h3 in St Clears:

It is clear that the Council considers that the site is deliverable for the purposes of 100 houses, although it is not clear on what basis this conclusion has been made. It is also unclear how the allocation of a previously allocated ‘green wedge’, used in order to protect local green spaces as well as to prohibit the coalescence of settlements, would now be deemed to be appropriate for future housing development.
There have been no planning applications made relating to the allocation site in question to date.
We object to the inclusion of the allocation in question on the basis of the above and that its inclusion within the Plan would result in the document being ‘unsound’.
We therefore respectfully request that this Representation be given careful examination, and that the allocation be removed to ensure that the document passes all the relevant tests of soundness.

Attachments:


Our response:

The allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.

Object

Second Deposit LDP

SuV63/h1

Representation ID: 5103

Received: 12/04/2023

Respondent ID: 4967

Respondent: Evans Banks Planning Limited

Agent: Evans Banks Planning Limited

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

Site SuV63/h1 – Land at Woodend, Llanmiloe. Further to the publication of the above document, we have been asked by our Clients to review its contents, policies and proposals and advise them of any aspects we believe would unreasonably affect their aspirations and interests. In doing so we consider it necessary to make a formal representation to the “soundness” of the Carmarthenshire Deposit Local Development Plan in relation to the allocation for residential development at Land at Woodend, Llanmiloe (LDP Ref. No. SuV63/h1) under the provisions of Policy HOM1. The proposed allocation has been fully assessed and in considering its context and background (summarised below) it is considered that its continued inclusion will lead to the Plan failing the 3 Tests of Soundness for the reasons set out below.

Attachments:


Our response:

Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.

Object

Second Deposit LDP

SuV61/h1

Representation ID: 5114

Received: 12/04/2023

Respondent ID: 4967

Respondent: Evans Banks Planning Limited

Agent: Evans Banks Planning Limited

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

We consider it necessary to make a formal representation to the “soundness” of the Carmarthenshire Deposit Local Development Plan in relation to the allocation for residential development at Land at Nieuport Farm, Pendine (LDP Ref. No. SuV61/h1) under the provisions of Policy HOM1. The proposed allocation has been fully assessed and in considering its context and background (summarised below) it is considered that its continued inclusion will lead to the Plan failing the 3 Tests of Soundness for the reasons set out below.

Attachments:


Our response:

Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.

Object

Second Deposit LDP

SuV60/h1

Representation ID: 5116

Received: 12/04/2023

Respondent ID: 4967

Respondent: Evans Banks Planning Limited

Agent: Evans Banks Planning Limited

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

Object to the inclusion of the allocation in question on the basis of the above and that its inclusion within the Plan would result in the document being ‘unsound’.
We therefore respectfully request that this Representation be given careful examination, and that the allocation be removed to ensure that the document passes all the relevant tests of soundness.

Attachments:


Our response:

Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.