PrC2/GT1
Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4662
Derbyniwyd: 26/03/2023
Ymatebydd: Ms Cari Evans
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Building a gypsy campsite near Trostre will have a negative affect on its shopping centre and local communities. No information given by the council about this plan. Shame on you Carmarthenshire county council. You have hides this planning.
What about the wildlife that live in the area proposed? We have many foxes, birds and hedgehogs in the area which will be disturbed and will moce further up into residential areas.
How is this area even proposed initially?
Build elsewhere. No proposed images of site planning given, just area proposal.
Building a gypsy campsite near Trostre will have a negative affect on its shopping centre and local communities. No information given by the council about this plan. Shame on you Carmarthenshire county council. You have hides this planning.
What about the wildlife that live in the area proposed? We have many foxes, birds and hedgehogs in the area which will be disturbed and will moce further up into residential areas.
How is this area even proposed initially?
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared. Further evidential work will be submitted as part of the submission documents to inform the examination
Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4664
Derbyniwyd: 26/03/2023
Ymatebydd: Mrs Sophie Chapron
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
The Tyisha area is an up and coming area. Having this plan go ahead would severely damage the reputation of the Tyisha/penyfan area. There are many ill and elderly residents in the area that I feel will upset them also.
The whole plan is a very bad idea and needs to be scrapped. If the plan goes ahead the residents of penyfan and Tyisha will suffer greatly due to things like. Cost of insurance going up crime rate going up and safety issues
The Tyisha area is an up and coming area. Having this plan go ahead would severely damage the reputation of the Tyisha/penyfan area. There are many ill and elderly residents in the area that I feel will upset them also.
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared. Further evidential work will be submitted as part of the submission documents to inform the examination
Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4665
Derbyniwyd: 27/03/2023
Ymatebydd: Mr Rob Rees
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
I object to the proposal of placing a gypsy traveller site in Penyfan quarry on the following grounds;
1. The site is a natural habitat for wildlife and should be left undisturbed.
2. The council do not own all of the land and would have to purchase 'recreational ground' from a third party. This is not a good use of council tax payers money.
3. The access to the site is totally unsuitable as Trostre Road is already far too busy. The access road would also be far too close to existing properties posing a danger to children who have played in the quarry for years.
4. The site is far too close to an already densely populated area. The site would devalue properties and be detrimental to the wellbeing of local residents. (This process is already causing anger and anxiety amongst local tax paying residents.)
The 9 original sites that were chosen were flawed. The former scrap yard, Neville Dock was dismissed due to location being adjacent to a bad neighbour!! Really - how do you think a gypsy traveler site will be viewed by its neighbours?
Site 6 - Old Bobby's farm was selected even though it was far too small!
All 9 sites should have been capable of housing the proposed site. The process is flawed!
I object to the proposal of placing a gypsy traveler site in Penyfan quarry on the following grounds;
1. The site is a natural habitat for wildlife and should be left undisturbed.
2. The council do not own all of the land and would have to purchase 'recreational ground' from a third party. This is not a good use of council tax payers money.
3. The access to the site is totally unsuitable as Trostre Road is already far too busy. The access road would also be far too close to existing properties posing a danger to children who have played in the quarry for years.
4. The site is far too close to an already densely populated area. The site would devalue properties and be detrimental to the wellbeing of local residents. (This process is already causing anger and anxiety amongst local tax paying residents.)
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared. Further evidential work will be submitted as part of the submission documents to inform the examination
Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4679
Derbyniwyd: 28/03/2023
Ymatebydd: Miss Kirsty Howells
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
1. The site is a natural habitat for wildlife and should be left undisturbed.
2. The council do not own all of the land and would have to purchase 'recreational ground, area D above, from a third party. This is not a good use of council tax payer's money.
3. The access to the site is totally unsuitable as Trostre Road is already far too busy. The access road would also be far too close to existing properties posing a danger to children who have played in the quarry for years.
Plan not to go ahead
1. The site is a natural habitat for wildlife and should be left undisturbed.
2. The council do not own all of the land and would have to purchase 'recreational ground, area D above, from a third party. This is not a good use of council tax payer's money.
3. The access to the site is totally unsuitable as Trostre Road is already far too busy. The access road would also be far too close to existing properties posing a danger to children who have played in the quarry for years.
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared. Further evidential work will be submitted as part of the submission documents to inform the examination
Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4680
Derbyniwyd: 28/03/2023
Ymatebydd: Mr Craig Rees
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
1.The Council do not own the land and would have to purchase “Recreational Ground” from a third party, this is not a good or fair use of Council tax payers money.
2.The site is a natural habitat for wildlife
3.The site would be way too close to a densely populated area. The site would also devalue the properties and have a detrimental to the wellbeing of the local residents.
4.Access to the site would be totally unsuitable as Trostre Road is already far too busy and access would be to close to existing properties and will cause a danger.
Scrap the plan and look for a new site.
1.The Council do not own the land and would have to purchase “Recreational Ground” from a third party, this is not a good or fair use of Council tax payers money.
2.The site is a natural habitat for wildlife
3.The site would be way too close to a densely populated area. The site would also devalue the properties and have a detrimental to the wellbeing of the local residents.
4.Access to the site would be totally unsuitable as Trostre Road is already far too busy and access would be to close to existing properties and will cause a danger.
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared. Further evidential work will be submitted as part of the submission documents to inform the examination
Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4681
Derbyniwyd: 28/03/2023
Ymatebydd: Miss Clare Nock
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
OBJECT
Site is a natural habitat should be left as it is. Access to site totally unsuitable. Site will devalue all surrounding properties and safety and security would be of massive concern. I will sell my house if this goes ahead. Extremely unhappy
Do not build this site close to an already over populated area. Choose another less populated site
OBJECT
Site is a natural habitat should be left as it is.
Access to site totally unsuitable.
Site will devalue all surrounding properties and safety and security would be of massive concern. I will sell my house if this goes ahead.
Extremely unhappy
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared. Further evidential work will be submitted as part of the submission documents to inform the examination
Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4682
Derbyniwyd: 29/03/2023
Ymatebydd: Mrs sharon davies
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
The proposed site is too close to an already densely populated area. The site will devalue properties and cause anger and distress to tax payers and elderly who have lived in the area for many years.
It needs to be moved to a more rural area.
THE PROPOSED SITE IS TOO CLOSE TO AN ALREADY DENSLY POPULATED AREA
THE SITE WILL DEVALUE PROPERTIES AND CAUSE ANGER AND DISTRESS TO TAX PAYERS AND ELDERLY WHO HAVE LIVED IN THE AREA FOR MANY YEARS
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared. Further evidential work will be submitted as part of the submission documents to inform the examination
Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4684
Derbyniwyd: 27/03/2023
Ymatebydd: Mrs Vanessa Latham
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Heb nodi
Objection to the site PrC2/GT1
Objection includes loss of green space, loss of natural habitat, flooding, knotweed, removal of trees, increase in traffic, air and noise pollution, create health issues, and impossible to screen off from view
Remove site from the Plan
Proposed traveller/gypsy site heol gwyr lower trostre rd.
I strongly object to this second deposit moving forward.
My reasons being, loss of green space, loss of natural habitat.
I feel this is going against the Welsh government future generation act 2018.
Also under the Welsh government states that traveller must have the light on overnight to move safely,this would be detrimental to nature and human life. And the noise pollution that would be created. both of which have been proven to cause many illnesses including mental health issues.
Also the Welsh government states that any traveller site has to be screened off from existing properties.
This is impossible as the next two streets are elevated and the site will be visible and impossible to screen off from view.
The proposed site has knotweed which has to be removed at considerable cost.
Increase in traffic on an already busy road.
Penyfan is a high risk area for flooding, and removal of trees would create more flooding and co2 gases causing more air pollution.again going against Welsh government policies of creating cleaner air.
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared. Further evidential work will be submitted as part of the submission documents to inform the examination
Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4685
Derbyniwyd: 20/03/2023
Ymatebydd: Cllr. M Cranham
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Heb nodi
Objection to allocated site PrC2/GT1 with the reasons including increase in traffic and traffic flow, lack of privacy, conservation and environmental damage, Lack of lighting and CCTV, social and community problems. Other issues relating to local infrastructures e.g. local schools and health services.
Remove site from the Plan
Could I officially object to the location of Penyfan being used as a Travellers site now and for the future.
My main objection would be the access from the site of Traveller vehicles onto what is now a very busy road.
It is the only road leading from the West to a usually packed Trostre shopping area. There would be an increase in the traffic within the next year and a half due to the new building of Pentre Awel. This would affect the traffic flow and road safety on a very busy road.
There have been over 100 objections so far by residents regarding lack of privacy, conservation and environmental damage and also the impact on traffic and those residents themselves.
There is a lack of lighting, also no cctv.
There could be social community problems, where there could be a community impact on the travellers themselves by existing residents who have opposed the site.
Possibly seen as a blight for visitors that visit Trostre Enterprise Park, and Pentre Awel.
Issues relating to local infrastructures e.g. local schools and health services.
I feel the Penyfan location is not suitable for a travellers site, and should not be earmarked for any prospective planning application.
Regards
Michael Cranham
County Councillor
Bigyn Ward
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared. Further evidential work will be submitted as part of the submission documents to inform the examination
Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4686
Derbyniwyd: 26/03/2023
Ymatebydd: Ms Andrea Thomas
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Heb nodi
Objection to the site PrC2/GT1. Strongly oppose this site not only will it take away our green space and affect the local wildlife it will affect the community who live right next to it with noise & light pollution and disrupt the peaceful cycle path that so many people use every day for access to trostre and school children use as short cut to local schools it will affect all the residents wellbeing
Remove site from the Plan
I want to register that I strongly oppose this site not only will it take away our green space and affect the local wildlife it will affect the community who live right next to it with noise & light pollution and disrupt the peaceful cycle path that so many people use every day for access to trostre and school children use as short cut to local schools it will affect all the residents wellbeing
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared. Further evidential work will be submitted as part of the submission documents to inform the examination
Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4687
Derbyniwyd: 28/03/2023
Ymatebydd: Mr Craig Rees
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Heb nodi
Objection to the site PrC2/GT1.
The site is a natural habitat for wildlife and should remain that way. The site would be way too close to a densely populated area. The site would also devalue the properties and have a detrimental impact on the wellbeing of the local residents.
Other issues would include highway safety issues, noise, rubbish, and safety issues on the footpath
Remove site from plan
I object to the proposal of placing a Gypsy Traveller site on the following grounds.
1.The Council do not own the land and would have to purchase “Recreational Ground” from a third party, this is not a good or fair use of Council tax payers money.
2.The site is a natural habitat for wildlife and should remain that way.
3.The site would be way too close to a densely populated area. The site would also devalue the properties and have a detrimental to the wellbeing of the local residents.
4.Access to the site would be totally unsuitable as Trostre Road is already far too busy and access would be to close to existing properties and will cause a danger to children and people and cyclists using the pathway running along side
5.I also have concern about noise pollution, rubbish, theft and criminal damage from nearby properties as there are already issues with this in the street which has been unaddressed.
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared. Further evidential work will be submitted as part of the submission documents to inform the examination
Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4688
Derbyniwyd: 27/03/2023
Ymatebydd: Ms Paige Thomas
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Heb nodi
Objection to PrC2/GT1 - Strongly oppose this site not only will it take away our green space and affect the local wildlife it will affect the community who live right next to it with noise & light pollution and disrupt the peaceful cycle path that so many people use every day for access to Trostre and school children use as short cut to local schools it will affect all the residents wellbeing
Remove site from Plan
I want to register that I strongly oppose this site not only will it take away our green space and affect the local wildlife it will affect the community who live right next to it with noise & light pollution and disrupt the peaceful cycle path that so many people use every day for access to trostre and school children use as short cut to local schools it will affect all the residents wellbeing
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared. Further evidential work will be submitted as part of the submission documents to inform the examination
Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4689
Derbyniwyd: 27/03/2023
Ymatebydd: Rhian & Justin Justin
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Heb nodi
Object to the travellers site being put down the quarry in Penyfan/Trostre (PrC2/GT1). There is a massive amount of wildlife there that would be harmed and upset by the movement. Respondent cites concerns about the feeling of comfort and safety of their children should development take place.
Remove site from Plan
I object to the travellers site being put down the quarry In penyfan/trostre. There is a massive amount of wildlife there that would be harmed and upset by the movement. I also wouldn’t feel comfortable living where I am with travellers from all over coming and going. I have children that play there and it would make me feel very unsafe for them and myself in and around my own home.
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared. Further evidential work will be submitted as part of the submission documents to inform the examination
Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4690
Derbyniwyd: 30/03/2023
Ymatebydd: Eileen Carter
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Heb nodi
Objection to the site PrC2/GT1. It is not suitable because of light pollution, noise pollution, and this is the only green nature space we have.
Remove site from Plan
I'm writing to you to oppose the proposed traveller site on the quarry penyfan heol gwyr. I've lived here for 45 years and and it not suitable in my opinion, light pollution, noise pollution, this is the only green nature space we have.we are elevated here so you cannot even block it off from here or penyfan road. Surely there are better sites available.
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared. Further evidential work will be submitted as part of the submission documents to inform the examination
Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4691
Derbyniwyd: 26/03/2023
Ymatebydd: Abby Davies
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Heb nodi
Objection to the site PrC2/GT1
Remove site from Plan
I just wanted to email you in regards to the proposed traveller site in Penyfan and strictly vote against it in this area as I am a resident of this area and disagree on it completely.
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared. Further evidential work will be submitted as part of the submission documents to inform the examination
Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4692
Derbyniwyd: 30/03/2023
Ymatebydd: Mr David Tasker
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
In Summary both residents and wildlife would be affected combined with the safety issues mentioned, including traffic and access.
It's clear that the location needs a rethink,just because land is available does not make it the correct place to develop.
There are a number of issues I feel make this a problematic development location.
1)
As I understand it,some of the land is not owned by the council ,area D, this would necessitate using tax payers money to purchase it,to my mind an unnecessary expense.
2) As someone who both drives,cycles and runs along Trostre Rd ,I regularly see the already large volumes of traffic that use it,to then add to this with further volume and the potential hazards another entrance would cause seems foolhardy.
3) As previous sites ,in poorly chosen locations have shown,they can have a drastic effect on property prices and indeed to the quality of life to local residents.
4)The land adjacent is used by children and dog walkers alike which would deprive both groups of that access.
5) it is a natural habitat too wild life and as such should be left undisturbed.
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared. Further evidential work will be submitted as part of the submission documents to inform the examination
Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4693
Derbyniwyd: 31/03/2023
Ymatebydd: Miss Lyndsay Merriman
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Taking away yet more greenery from the area and bad for the wildlife.
I think it should be moved to a more suitable area
Taking away yet more greenery from the area and bad for the wildlife
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared. Further evidential work will be submitted as part of the submission documents to inform the examination
Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4695
Derbyniwyd: 31/03/2023
Ymatebydd: Mr Les Pugh
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Too congested already with traffic into trading and retail parks. detrimental to wildlife. area is already densely populated. site would devalue properties. local council tax payers are already deeply concerned and distressed by this proposed site. Council does not own all of the proposed land and will therefore be using our taxes to purchase it. site will cause more pollution and be detrimental to environment and our health.
scrap the plans proposed - that area would better serve the community if converted to allotments for local use. there is far more available open space to be found in Machynys along with much better established access routes there.
too congested already with traffic into trading and retail parks. detrimental to wildlife. area is already densely populated. site would devalue properties. local council tax payers are already deeply concerned and distressed by this proposed site. council does not own all of the proposed land and will therefore be using our taxes to purchase it. site will cause more pollution and be detrimental to environment and our health.
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared. Further evidential work will be submitted as part of the submission documents to inform the examination
Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4696
Derbyniwyd: 01/04/2023
Ymatebydd: Mr Michael Pugh
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
I object to the proposed traveller site.
The access road is already far too busy. Monies have already been spent on creating a £1.8M cycle path which will be alongside the site. People will not use it for fear of increased traffic & social problems. Site is too close to densely populated housing & fear of devaluation. I would not feel safe walking my dogs in the quarry as I do now daily & play with my grandkids.
A new location should be sought . Why cannot the Bynea site be expanded ?
I object to the proposed traveller site.
The access road is already far too busy. Monies have already been spent on creating a £1.8M cycle path which will be alongside the site. People will not use it for fear of increased traffic & social problems. Site is too close to densely populated housing & fear of devaluation. I would not feel safe walking my dogs in the quarry as I do now daily & play with my grandkids.
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared. Further evidential work will be submitted as part of the submission documents to inform the examination
Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4701
Derbyniwyd: 03/04/2023
Ymatebydd: Ms Alison Francis
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi
Cadarn? Ydi
I object to the proposal
I object to the proposal
I object to the proposal
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared. Further evidential work will be submitted as part of the submission documents to inform the examination
Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4702
Derbyniwyd: 03/04/2023
Ymatebydd: Mr Shaun Barry
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
I beleive the earmarked land should be left as is. This is important land for nature and need not be disturbed. The surrounding roads are not sufficient to accept any additional traffic weight.
Alternative and more suitable land that does not require purchasing should be sought.
I beleive the earmarked land should be left as is. This is important land for nature and need not be disturbed. The surrounding roads are not sufficient to accept any additional traffic weight.
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared. Further evidential work will be submitted as part of the submission documents to inform the examination
Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4703
Derbyniwyd: 03/04/2023
Ymatebydd: Ms Emma Rees
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Whilst there will be an access road from Trostre, there are no provisions for keeping residents homes safe on the pedestrian path that runs behind houses towards the quarry.
The site should be held in consideration of green belt area in order to preserve wildlife and green land in an already over-populated area.
It should be disregarded. If not disregarded, then safety provisions should be made to stop any access from mechanically propelled vehicles on the pedestrian path that leads through Llwynwhiliwg. ie gates or staggered gate system.
My mother lives at an address in Llwynwhiliwg and whilst there will be an access road from trostre, there are no provisions for keeping residents homes safe on the pedestrian path that runs behind houses towards the quarry.
The site should be held in consideration of green belt area in order to preserve wildlife and green land in an alraedy over populated area.
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared. Further evidential work will be submitted as part of the submission documents to inform the examination
Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4704
Derbyniwyd: 03/04/2023
Ymatebydd: Mrs Linda Jenkins
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
The site is far too close to an already over populated area. It will decrease the value of houses purchased privately by people. The traffic is already far too busy along Trostre Road and it will have a detrimental impact on pollution eg car fumes. Purchasing private land in order to site travellers is not a good use of tax payers money. Travellers will most likely use the pedestrian path in Llwynwhilwg to travel to the new site, causing issues for residents and placing their safety at risk.
It needs to be disregarded and plan to go somewhere else.
The site is far too close to an already over populated area.
It will decrease the value of houses purchased privately by people.
The traffic is already far too busy along Trostre Road and it will have a detrimental impact on pollution eg car fumes.
Purchasing private land in order to site travellers is not a good use of tax payers money.
Travellers will not adhere to rules and will most likely use the pedestrian path in Llwynwhilwg to travel to the new site, causing issues for residents and placing their safety at risk.
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared. Further evidential work will be submitted as part of the submission documents to inform the examination
Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4705
Derbyniwyd: 03/04/2023
Ymatebydd: Mrs nicola jones
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
I believe the site to be unsuitable for the following reasons:
* Site is green space
* Natural habitat for wildlife and plant life
* Recreational ground and public pathways in constant use
* Lack of privacy for both residents, adding to an already densely populated deprived area
* Private land will have to be paid for by tax payers money
* Access dangerous and unsuitable
* Adding to the heavy traffic which already exists and will get worse with the new Pentre Awel site
* Increasing CO2 emissions from traffic
The site should be removed altogether as an option for ANOTHER site in Llanelli. As a town we already have more than our share of sites and as it is cited that the county of Carmarthenshire should have a provision for more sites, I suggest that another are of Carmarthenshire be considered or add to an already existing site already in use.
I believe the site to be unsuitable for the following reasons (summarized)
* Site is green space
* Natural habitat for wildlife and plant life
* Recreational ground and public pathways in constant use
* Lack of privacy for both residents,adding to an already densely populated deprived area
* Private land will have to be paid for by tax payers money
* Access dangerous and unsuitable
* Adding to the heavy traffic which already exists and will get worse with the new Pentre Awel site
* Increasing CO2 emissions from traffic
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared. Further evidential work will be submitted as part of the submission documents to inform the examination
Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4706
Derbyniwyd: 04/04/2023
Ymatebydd: Mr Christopher Davies
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Object to the proposal of the gypsy site in penyfan quarry because It’s a natural habitat for wildlife. The council don’t own the land this is not a good use of tax payers money. The access to the site is totally unsuitable as Trostre Road is far to busy. The access road is close to existing property posing a danger to children. The site is to close to an already densely populated area. The site would devalue properties and be detrimental to the well being of local residents. This is already causing anger and anxiety to local residents.
I have been made aware that Penyfan Quarry has been selected as 1 of 4 potential sites for the new Gypsy travellers site.
I believe this site is totally unsuitable for reasons I've stated above.
I object to the proposal of the gypsy site in penyfan quarry because it’s a natural habitat for wildlife.
The council don’t own the land this is not a good use of tax payers money. The access to the site is totally unsuitable as Trostre Road is far to busy. The access road is close to existing property posing a danger to children.
The site is to close to an already densely populated area. The site would devalue properties and be detrimental to the well being of local residents. This is already causing anger and anxiety to local residents.
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared. Further evidential work will be submitted as part of the submission documents to inform the examination
Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4707
Derbyniwyd: 04/04/2023
Ymatebydd: Mrs Gaynor Griffiths
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
I object to the proposal of the gypsy site in Penyfan Quarry because it's a natural habitat for wildlife and should be left undisturbed. Council do not own the land so it's not a good use of tax payers money . Access to the site is totally unsuitable as Trostre road is already busy . Access road is too close to existing properties posing a danger to children who have played in the quarry for years . The site is too close to an already densely populated area . The site would devalue properties and wellbeing of residents .
Penyfan Quarry is not a suitable site and should therefore not go ahead for the reasons I have stated above.
I object to the proposal of the gypsy site in Penyfan Quarry because it's a natural habitat for wildlife and should be left undisturbed. Council do not own the land so it's not a good use of tax payers money . Access to the site is totally unsuitable as Trostre road is already busy . Access road is too close to existing properties posing a danger to children who have played in the quarry for years . The site is too close to an already densely populated area . The site would devalue properties and wellbeing of residents .
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared. Further evidential work will be submitted as part of the submission documents to inform the examination
Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4731
Derbyniwyd: 05/04/2023
Ymatebydd: Miss Caroline Butchers
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
I object to the proposal of placing a gypsy traveller site in Penyfan quarry on the following grounds:
1. The site is a natural habitat for wildlife and should be left undisturbed.
2. The site is far too close to an already densely populated area.
Another site needs to be considered. It cannot be placed in such a densely populated area such as Penyfan.
I object to the proposal of placing a gypsy traveller site in Penyfan quarry on the following grounds:
1. The site is a natural habitat for wildlife and should be left undisturbed.
2. The site is far too close to an already densely populated area.
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared. Further evidential work will be submitted as part of the submission documents to inform the examination
Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4734
Derbyniwyd: 05/04/2023
Ymatebydd: Miss Gaynor Rees
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
The site is a natural habitat for wildlife,the council do not own all of the land,access to the site is unsuitable it's too close to an already busy Trostre road,the site would devalue properties in the surrounding area and be detrimental to the wellbeing of local residents.
To find an alternative site for this.
The site is a natural habitat for wildlife,the council do not own all of the land,access to the site is unsuitable it's too close to an already busy Trostre road,the site would devalue properties in the surrounding area and be detrimental to the wellbeing of local residents.
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared. Further evidential work will be submitted as part of the submission documents to inform the examination
Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4741
Derbyniwyd: 09/04/2023
Ymatebydd: Mrs Joyce Rees
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
It is an unsuitable location. It will have a detrimental effect on local infrastructure that is already under strain. It is already an extremely busy area of Llanelli and this will increase under the proposed plans.
The area is already densely populated with a wide range of different families and also a lot of elderly people living on their own. This proposal would be detrimental to the mental health of the people living in these houses and bungalows.
The plans need to be scrapped immediately. The plans are not fit for purpose.
It is an unsuitable location. It will have a detrimental effect on local infrastructure that is already under strain. It is already an extremely busy area of Llanelli and this will increase under the proposed plans.
The area is already densely populated with a wide range of different families and also a lot of elderly people living on their own. This proposal would be detrimental to the mental health of the people living in these houses and bungalows.
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared. Further evidential work will be submitted as part of the submission documents to inform the examination
Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4742
Derbyniwyd: 10/04/2023
Ymatebydd: Mrs Michele Rees
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
I strongly object to the housing of a Gypsy/Traveller Site in Penyfan Quarry.
It is a natural habitat for plant and wild life and should be left alone.
The site is a natural soak away for rainwater in an area that is already susceptible to flooding (properties opposite Dock Stars Rugby ground rely on sand bags on their doorsteps during heavy rain!! In 2023!!!!)
The site is not all owned by the council and the procurement of this land would not be good use of my council tax!
Sites should be found further away from densely populated areas. To put a gypsy camp in the middle of an already densely populated area is criminal and causing huge anxiety within the community. There is no doubt that this ill thought out process is having an impact on my well being!
I strongly object to the housing of a Gypsy/Traveller Site in Penyfan Quarry.
It is a natural habitat for plant and wild life and should be left alone.
The site is a natural soak away for rainwater in an area that is already susceptible to flooding (properties opposite Dock Stars Rugby ground rely on sand bags on their doorsteps during heavy rain!! In 2023!!!!)
The site is not all owned by the council and the procurement of this land would not be good use of my council tax!
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared. Further evidential work will be submitted as part of the submission documents to inform the examination