Gwrthwynebu

Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin

ID sylw: 4665

Derbyniwyd: 27/03/2023

Ymatebydd: Mr Rob Rees

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I object to the proposal of placing a gypsy traveller site in Penyfan quarry on the following grounds;
1. The site is a natural habitat for wildlife and should be left undisturbed.
2. The council do not own all of the land and would have to purchase 'recreational ground' from a third party. This is not a good use of council tax payers money.
3. The access to the site is totally unsuitable as Trostre Road is already far too busy. The access road would also be far too close to existing properties posing a danger to children who have played in the quarry for years.
4. The site is far too close to an already densely populated area. The site would devalue properties and be detrimental to the wellbeing of local residents. (This process is already causing anger and anxiety amongst local tax paying residents.)

Newid wedi’i awgrymu gan ymatebydd:

The 9 original sites that were chosen were flawed. The former scrap yard, Neville Dock was dismissed due to location being adjacent to a bad neighbour!! Really - how do you think a gypsy traveler site will be viewed by its neighbours?
Site 6 - Old Bobby's farm was selected even though it was far too small!
All 9 sites should have been capable of housing the proposed site. The process is flawed!

Testun llawn:

I object to the proposal of placing a gypsy traveler site in Penyfan quarry on the following grounds;
1. The site is a natural habitat for wildlife and should be left undisturbed.
2. The council do not own all of the land and would have to purchase 'recreational ground' from a third party. This is not a good use of council tax payers money.
3. The access to the site is totally unsuitable as Trostre Road is already far too busy. The access road would also be far too close to existing properties posing a danger to children who have played in the quarry for years.
4. The site is far too close to an already densely populated area. The site would devalue properties and be detrimental to the wellbeing of local residents. (This process is already causing anger and anxiety amongst local tax paying residents.)

Atodiadau:


Ein hymateb:

Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared. Further evidential work will be submitted as part of the submission documents to inform the examination