Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 5699
Derbyniwyd: 12/04/2023
Ymatebydd: Gareth & Susan Williams
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Objection to the development limits, as drawn around the Former Glanamman Hospital and grounds (AS2/064/005), under Policy SD1. Objection to potential housing development on this site on conservation grounds and lack of access. Approximately 700 people objected to housing development on this site under the aegis of the RLDP and previous Planning Applications.
It is emphasised that development of housing on this land would be contrary to a number of Revised LDP policies.
An alternative use is proposed for this site - refer to representations 5700 & 5701.
We support the Council’s decision to remove this site from housing allocation, and
to remove the land to the west of this site from development limits. We would also
suggest that this site should not be considered as suitable for any potential future
housing development. We believe this to be necessary for compliance with the
strategic policies we have mentioned.
We would also suggest that the land to the East of this site (at 51.809167 ,
-3.923369) should also be removed from development limits, as it is currently a
valuable wildlife habitat, and should be conserved as such.
We would suggest that the site be allocated under SP2, SG1: Regeneration and
Mixed-Use Sites, as public amenity space, for any future redevelopment, and we
feel that such a reclassification would be to the benefit of the local community, and
would assist the Council in meeting its obligations regarding nature conservation,
sustainable development, and placemaking.
As members of the Tirycoed Campaign Group, we would refer you to the
submission made by Dr. John Studley, on behalf of the group, for full and detailed
reasoning, reference to supporting information, and suggestions for potential
future use of this site.
Disagree. The development limits as drawn, encompassing the former hospital buildings and grounds, is considered appropriate and reflective of its location within the urban form, and given its status as previously developed land with vacant buildings. Future proposals on this land will be considered in accordance with LDP policy.