Safleoedd Ymgeisio a Gyflwynwyd / Candidate Site Submissions

Object

Representation ID: 2659

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Llandyfaelog Community Council

Llandyfaelog Community Council opposes this candidate site. The area has had a large amount of recent development and it is felt that the road infrastructure is at capacity. The access arrangements are unlikely to cope with further homes and vehicles, leading to traffic following the narrow adjacent farm lane as a wholly inappropriate shortcut to the dual carriageway.

Object

Representation ID: 2660

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Llandyfaelog Community Council

Llandyfaelog Community Council opposes this candidate site. The area has had a large amount of recent development and it is felt that the road infrastructure is at capacity. The access arrangements are unlikely to cope with further homes and vehicles, leading to traffic following the narrow adjacent farm lane as a wholly inappropriate shortcut to the dual carriageway.

Object

Representation ID: 2661

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Llandyfaelog Community Council

Llandyfaelog Community Council opposes this candidate site. The area proportionally has had a large amount of recent development. It is felt that the road and waste infrastructure will be unable to cope with further development in the area. The lane leading to the site is also very narrow.

Object

Representation ID: 2662

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Llandyfaelog Community Council

The candidate sites appears to be an inappropriate scale for the village and should be reduced. The road and other infrastructure through the village is unlikely to cope with the scale of development suggested by the site. The depth should be reduced. Llandyfaelog Community Council does not support the current proposal

Object

Representation ID: 2663

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Llandyfaelog Community Council

The depth of the candidate site appears inappropriate, Llandyfaelog Community Council would suggest that the depth is reduced in order that a single line of roadside homes is possible only.

Object

Representation ID: 2665

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Llandyfaelog Community Council

There is scope for development at this location, however the scale proposed does not appear appropriate for the area.

The size of the candidate site should be reduced as the locality does not include adjacent relevant developments.

Object

Representation ID: 2666

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Llandyfaelog Community Council

The candidate sites appears to be an inappropriate scale for the village and should be reduced. The road and other infrastructure through the village is unlikely to cope with the scale of development suggested by the site. The depth should be reduced.

Llandyfaelog Community Council does not support the current proposal.

Object

Representation ID: 2672

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Llandyfaelog Community Council

Llandyfaelog Community Council opposes this candidate site.

The location has previously been rejected as on a flood plain. The area has had a large amount of recent development and it is felt that the road and other infrastructure is at capacity. The access arrangements are unlikely to cope with further homes and vehicles exacerbating the already serious problems in the area.

Object

Representation ID: 2673

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Llandyfaelog Community Council

Llandyfaelog Community Council opposes this candidate site, the area has had a large amount of recent development and it is felt that the road and other infrastructure is at capacity. The access arrangements are unlikely to cope with further homes and vehicles, leading to traffic following the nearby narrow farm lane as a wholly inappropriate short cut to the dual carriageway.

Object

Representation ID: 2676

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Llandyfaelog Community Council

There is scope for development at this location, however the scale proposed does not appear appropriate for the area. The size of the candidate site should be reduced as the locality does not include adjacent relevant developments.