Second Deposit LDP

Search representations

Results for Seasons Holidays Plc search

New search New search

Object

Second Deposit LDP

SD1: Development Limits

Representation ID: 4973

Received: 14/04/2023

Respondent ID: 5473

Respondent: Seasons Holidays Plc

Agent: Lichfields

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

The proposed boundary of Laugharne remains the same as the first deposit plan draft proposals map. The existing Laugharne Park Estate is not open countryside, does not border or close a strategic gap between settlements, and is an existing development site with extant and implemented permission for C1 use - Its use is effectively hotel use. The fact that the resort is not shown as being within the development limits makes the Plan inconsistent in how it treats main town centre uses. It could limit further development that would assist economic growth at the site.


Our response:

Disagree. The inclusion of the whole estate of the existing Laugharne Park Estate within the development limits would be unreasonable within the context of the development Plan. The policy framework within the revised LDP provides sufficient flexibility for the consideration of any tourism and leisure related activities / developments.

Object

Second Deposit LDP

Strategic Policy – SP 11: The Visitor Economy

Representation ID: 4976

Received: 14/04/2023

Respondent ID: 5473

Respondent: Seasons Holidays Plc

Agent: Lichfields

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

Seasons Holidays Plc object to the non-inclusion of the Phase 2 of Dylan Coastal Resorts expansion.

In relation to Policy SP11, the Plan would not be compliant with the Policy objectives should Phase 2 not be allocated. The Plan, in allocating only 100 units of holiday accommodation offers insufficient support to meet its policy targets and objectives. It also fails to reflect national policy objectives and so would be inconsistent with national policy. Failure to allocate phase 2 leaves policy SP11 ineffective and inconsistent and it therefore fails the test of soundness.


Our response:

The policy framework set out within the revised LDP allows the potential development for tourism and the visitor economy where it is appropriately located. Any proposals submitted will be considered against the revised LDP policies.

Object

Second Deposit LDP

SO13 To make provision for sustainable & high quality all year round tourism related initiatives.

Representation ID: 4977

Received: 14/04/2023

Respondent ID: 5473

Respondent: Seasons Holidays Plc

Agent: Lichfields

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

Seasons Holidays Plc object to the non-inclusion of the Phase 2 of Dylan Coastal Resorts expansion.

As drafted, the Local Plan does not adequately plan for growth within the tourism economy in Carmarthenshire as is specifically detailed as necessary by policy 29 of the National Development Framework, Future Wales 2040.

As such, in relation to Policy SO13, the Plan would not be compliant with this strategic objective nor with national policy and therefore the plan is inconsistent with national and local growth policies and fails the test of soundness.


Our response:

The inclusion of the whole Dylan Coastal Resort within the development limits would be unreasonable within the context of the development Plan. The policy framework within the revised LDP provides sufficient flexibility for the consideration of any tourism and leisure related activities / developments, and therefore can be read in conjunction with SO13.

Object

Second Deposit LDP

SeC20/MU1

Representation ID: 4978

Received: 14/04/2023

Respondent ID: 5473

Respondent: Seasons Holidays Plc

Agent: Lichfields

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

Seasons Holidays welcomes the allocation of phase 1 within the second Deposit Plan. However, they are disappointed to see that Phase 2 has not been included and object to the Plan on this basis.

As is demonstrated by the full representations, Phase 2 is deliverable, is required in the plan period, would bring sufficient economic benefits to the local area and enables the plan to deliver on national and its own strategic objectives.

Failure to allocate phase 2 means the Plan fails the test of soundness.

We wish to participate in the hearing session on this matter.


Our response:

The policy framework set out within the revised LDP allows the potential
development for tourism and the visitor economy where it is appropriately located. Any proposals submitted will be considered against the revised LDP policies.

Support

Second Deposit LDP

SeC20/MU1

Representation ID: 5509

Received: 14/04/2023

Respondent ID: 5473

Respondent: Seasons Holidays Plc

Agent: Lichfields

Representation Summary:

Supports the inclusion of SeC20/MU1


Our response:

Support welcomed.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.