Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin

Chwilio sylwadau

Canlyniadau chwilio Seasons Holidays Plc

Chwilio o’r newydd Chwilio o’r newydd

Gwrthwynebu

Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin

SD1: Terfynau Datblygu

ID sylw: 4973

Derbyniwyd: 14/04/2023

Respondent ID: 5473

Ymatebydd: Seasons Holidays Plc

Asiant : Lichfields

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The proposed boundary of Laugharne remains the same as the first deposit plan draft proposals map. The existing Laugharne Park Estate is not open countryside, does not border or close a strategic gap between settlements, and is an existing development site with extant and implemented permission for C1 use - Its use is effectively hotel use. The fact that the resort is not shown as being within the development limits makes the Plan inconsistent in how it treats main town centre uses. It could limit further development that would assist economic growth at the site.


Ein hymateb:

Disagree. The inclusion of the whole estate of the existing Laugharne Park Estate within the development limits would be unreasonable within the context of the development Plan. The policy framework within the revised LDP provides sufficient flexibility for the consideration of any tourism and leisure related activities / developments.

Gwrthwynebu

Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin

Polisi Strategol – SP 11: Yr Economi Ymwelwyr

ID sylw: 4976

Derbyniwyd: 14/04/2023

Respondent ID: 5473

Ymatebydd: Seasons Holidays Plc

Asiant : Lichfields

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Seasons Holidays Plc object to the non-inclusion of the Phase 2 of Dylan Coastal Resorts expansion.

In relation to Policy SP11, the Plan would not be compliant with the Policy objectives should Phase 2 not be allocated. The Plan, in allocating only 100 units of holiday accommodation offers insufficient support to meet its policy targets and objectives. It also fails to reflect national policy objectives and so would be inconsistent with national policy. Failure to allocate phase 2 leaves policy SP11 ineffective and inconsistent and it therefore fails the test of soundness.


Ein hymateb:

The policy framework set out within the revised LDP allows the potential development for tourism and the visitor economy where it is appropriately located. Any proposals submitted will be considered against the revised LDP policies.

Gwrthwynebu

Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin

AS13 Darparu ar gyfer mentrau twristiaeth cynaliadwy o ansawdd uchel drwy gydol y flwyddyn.

ID sylw: 4977

Derbyniwyd: 14/04/2023

Respondent ID: 5473

Ymatebydd: Seasons Holidays Plc

Asiant : Lichfields

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Seasons Holidays Plc object to the non-inclusion of the Phase 2 of Dylan Coastal Resorts expansion.

As drafted, the Local Plan does not adequately plan for growth within the tourism economy in Carmarthenshire as is specifically detailed as necessary by policy 29 of the National Development Framework, Future Wales 2040.

As such, in relation to Policy SO13, the Plan would not be compliant with this strategic objective nor with national policy and therefore the plan is inconsistent with national and local growth policies and fails the test of soundness.


Ein hymateb:

The inclusion of the whole Dylan Coastal Resort within the development limits would be unreasonable within the context of the development Plan. The policy framework within the revised LDP provides sufficient flexibility for the consideration of any tourism and leisure related activities / developments, and therefore can be read in conjunction with SO13.

Gwrthwynebu

Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin

SeC20/MU1

ID sylw: 4978

Derbyniwyd: 14/04/2023

Respondent ID: 5473

Ymatebydd: Seasons Holidays Plc

Asiant : Lichfields

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Seasons Holidays welcomes the allocation of phase 1 within the second Deposit Plan. However, they are disappointed to see that Phase 2 has not been included and object to the Plan on this basis.

As is demonstrated by the full representations, Phase 2 is deliverable, is required in the plan period, would bring sufficient economic benefits to the local area and enables the plan to deliver on national and its own strategic objectives.

Failure to allocate phase 2 means the Plan fails the test of soundness.

We wish to participate in the hearing session on this matter.


Ein hymateb:

The policy framework set out within the revised LDP allows the potential
development for tourism and the visitor economy where it is appropriately located. Any proposals submitted will be considered against the revised LDP policies.

Cefnogi

Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin

SeC20/MU1

ID sylw: 5509

Derbyniwyd: 14/04/2023

Respondent ID: 5473

Ymatebydd: Seasons Holidays Plc

Asiant : Lichfields

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Supports the inclusion of SeC20/MU1


Ein hymateb:

Support welcomed.

Am gyfarwyddiadau ar sut i ddefnyddio’r system ac i wneud sylwadau, gwelwch ein canllaw cymorth.