Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 6083

Derbyniwyd: 25/06/2026

Respondent ID: 619

Ymatebydd: Mudiad Amddiffyn Porthyrhyd

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Er mor resymol yw’r argymhellion y tro hwn parthed safle SuV20/h1, gofynnwn yn garedig i chwi ystyried y canlynol os gwelwch yn dda:
• Yn sgil y newid dramatig yn y ddarparieth dai yma ym Mhorth-y-rhyd, a gytunwch bod angen ail edrych ar yr angen am gartrefi yn y pentref?
• Oes tystiolaeth ddigonol bod gwir angen datblygu rhagor o safleoedd yn y pentref i gwrdd â'r galw yn lleol gan bod 42 o gartrefi yn cael eu hadeiladu ar safle Wernfraith?
• Pam bod y pentref lleiaf cynaliadwy unwaith eto'n cael cwota uwch?
• Onid yw'r pentref bellach wedi derbyn ei gwota?
• A ydych chi’n cytuno y dylid datrys y problemau sy’n bodoli gyda llifogydd a’r is-adeiledd cyn caniatáu rhagor o ddatblygu yn y pentref?

Although the recommendation for site SuV20/h1 appears reasonable (6 dwellings), MAP kindly requests on behalf of the residents, that you consider the following questions:
• In view of the recent dramatic change in housing provision in Porth-y-rhyd would you agree that there is a need to look again at the settlement's level of housing need?
• Is there sufficient evidence to claim that there is a need for more dwellings when taking into consideration that 42 units will be provided on the Wernfraith site to meet the local need?
• Why is it that the least sustainable village once again has a higher quota of dwellings?
• Has not the village of Porth-y-rhyd already reached the expected quota?
• Would you agree that there are serious issues (flooding and infrastructure) that need to be resolved before further developments are approved?

Mae'r ymatebydd wedi gwneud sylwadau penodol i'r safle ynghylch safle SuV20/h1, fodd bynnag, nid yw'r sylwadau hyn wedi'u gwneud yn briodol gan nad ydynt yn ymwneud â Newidiadau Materion a Godwyd. Fodd bynnag, mae'r ymatebydd yn cynnwys sylw ar MAC057 - Dwysedd ac felly ystyrir bod yr elfen hon o'r ymateb wedi'i gwneud yn briodol. Nodir cyfeiriad at ddwysedd ar y safle, fodd bynnag, bydd materion manylion a nifer y tai yn cael eu hystyried ymhellach fel rhan o unrhyw gais cynllunio. Mae'r Cyngor o'r farn bod y polisi Dwysedd yn darparu digon o hyblygrwydd mewn perthynas â defnydd effeithlon o dir.

The respondent has made site specific representation relating to site SuV20/h1 however these comments are not duly made as it does not relate to a MAC. However the respondent includes a comment on MAC057 - Density and therefore this element of the response is deemed to be duly made. Reference to density on the site is noted, however matters of detail and housing numbers will be further considered as part of any planning application. The Council considers that the Density policy provides sufficient flexibility in relation to the efficient use of land.