Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 5220
Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2023
Ymatebydd: Miss Joy Richards
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Ydi
Objection to housing allocation PrC3/h4 under policy HOM1: The respondent raises further concerns in regard to this allocation, which first obtained outline in 2009 (ref E/21663), however, in 12 years no progression of work or development can be seen. Refer also to representation 4652 in which the respondent seeks the inclusion of site (SR/004/004). The respondent adds that site PrC3/h4 is located within a 1 mile of SR/004/004 and is far greater in size. Therefore it is argued that the ongoing impact both to the local residents and environment would be much greater from PrC3/h4 than from SR/004/004.
Remove housing allocation PrC3/h4.
I would like to include site (SR/004/004) for consideration within the LDP.
About the site:
- The site is located on Penybanc Road, with direct access. The access road would fit in with current highway safety.
- Should planning permission be granted for the site I wish to immediately start the process of building for affordable housing.
- The site does not support habitats for any protected species or wildlife.
- The site is close to many public transport links and amenities. (1.3 miles to Ammanford bus station, 1.3 miles Ammanford train station, Bus stops along Penybanc Road)
- Recently built adjacent sites will allow easy access to sewerage, mains water and power lines.
- The site does not overlook any adjacent property or buildings.
- I would like all buildings on the site to be sustainable eco housing.
Please see attached images below showing the site and confirmation of ownership.
I have further concerns in regards to site PrC3/h4. This site first obtained outline in 2009 (ref E/21663). However, in 12 years no progression of work or development can be seen. The site is located within a 1 mile of my proposed site. The size of site PrC3/h4 is far greater than my own. Therefore I could argue that the ongoing impact both to the local residents and environment would be much larger should this site be approved and not my own. As I have stated above I’d want the development works on my site to begin as soon as possible should the permission be granted. Site PrC3/h4 has had this opportunity for over a decade and no action has been taken. This is an opportunity wasted, however this would not be the case on my site.
Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.