Gwrthwynebu

Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin

ID sylw: 5066

Derbyniwyd: 11/04/2023

Ymatebydd: Mr R Owen

Nifer y bobl: 2

Asiant : Evans Banks Planning Limited

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Objection to Policy HOM1 in regard to the non allocation of candidate site SR/018/002 in Capel Hendre:
The allocation of this site would be in line with established planning principles (i.e. not lead to the coalescence of settlements) and be consistent with it and the assessment approach of the Council in relation to proposed allocations. On the basis of the above, we consider the sites exclusion to be an illogical and erroneous decision by the Council and consider therefore that the LDP as it stands is “unsound” and fails to meet the required Tests of Soundness.

Newid wedi’i awgrymu gan ymatebydd:

Allocate the above site for housing within the Revised LDP.

Testun llawn:

Land off Lotwen Road, Capel Hendre
Further to the publication of the above document, we have been asked by our Client to review its contents, policies and proposals and advise them of any aspects we believe would
unreasonably affect their aspirations and interests. In doing so, we consider that the proposed provisions of Policy HOM1 are of particular interest to our Client. As a result, we
offer the following for the Authority’s consideration, and Inspector’s in due course.

Our clients made a formal Candidate Site Submission in August 2018, which was referenced SR/018/002, seeking the allocation of their land for future residential development within the defined settlement limits of Capel Hendre as part of the Replacement Local Development Plan. The Candidate Site is edged red below in Plan A.

Please see accompanying Alternative Site Report attached.

Atodiadau:


Ein hymateb:

The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.