Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 5000
Derbyniwyd: 14/04/2023
Ymatebydd: Miss Elissa Aldous-Hughes
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
The phrasing of "unacceptable" is extremely vague and unspecific. Who gets to define what is unacceptable and according to what criteria? Without a more specific framework of criteria how is the value of "unacceptability" worked out? This vague terminology gives no agreed boundaries as to what is "unacceptable". It is simply a term of personal choice, to be applied according to the whims and preferences of whoever is making the decision. The wording totally diminishes and disempowers any local viewpoints and removes their ability to challenge proposed developments.
The wording should be updated to more specifically define what "unacceptable impacts" are.
The phrasing of "unacceptable" is extremely vague and unspecific. Who gets to define what is unacceptable and according to what criteria? Without a more specific framework of criteria how is the value of "unacceptability" worked out? This vague terminology gives no agreed boundaries as to what is "unacceptable". It is simply a term of personal choice, to be applied according to the whims and preferences of whoever is making the decision. The wording totally diminishes and disempowers any local viewpoints and removes their ability to challenge proposed developments.
Disagree. The policies and proposals of the LDP are considered sound and deliverable emerging from a robust evidence base and having been formulated with regard to national planning policy. Matter to be further considered at examination.