Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4927
Derbyniwyd: 03/04/2023
Ymatebydd: Mr Clive Douch
Asiant : Nicole Jones
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
The representation seeks the inclusion of the rear part of the property called Myrtlebury Farm at Llannon Road, B4306 on the South edge of Pontyberem (candidate site ref: SR/138/004). Amongst other reasons in support of its inclusion the representation notes that the site would help sustain the community; be of modest size; not negatively impact amenity or landscape; and, would not give rise to any highway or utility objections.
Include site within the Plan
1. Introduction
We would like rear part of the dwelling called Myrtlebury Farm at Llannon Road, B4306 on the South edge of Pontyberem, to be considered as a candidate site to be
included in the new Local Development Plan.
2. Site Appraisal
This candidate site consists of the rear part the garden. It is of a rectangular shape and can be found just outside the settlement limits of Pontyberem Unitary
development plan.
The proposed site is a relatively flat grassed land with a gentle slope towards the road. It is bordered on three sides by mature hedgerows. No trees can be found on the land which could affect any development.
Myrtlebuury Farm now only consists of a single dwelling. The original farm house and outbuildings had been taken down a while ago.
3. Access
There is an existing access points farm on the Eastern side off Llannon Road which
will lead to the candidate site. There is no pedestrianized access and no public
footpath along the road.
At the point of entering the main road has a 50-mph controlled zone in place with a
good visibility standard in both directions up and down. No restrictions through tress,
bends or hedgerows. The road has got a good alignment
4. Flooding
The site lies well above the water level and in good distance from any water course.
No evidence can be found on the flood maps issued by the Environmental Agency –
Wales.
5. Pollution
This field is currently greenfield sites and use for grazing.
Evidence of a past development can be found on the land, which consisted of the
frame house, 2 cow sheds and a haybarn.
The radon level is under 1%.
No known contamination as happened to the land.
Not adjacent to a mineral buffer zone
The site does not lie in a sandstone recognised area.
No overhead power cable run through the field.
No activities have taken place which would have resulted in a contamination of the
soil or the sub soil.
6. Possible constrains
Overhead power cables run alongside the road and next to the candidate site. No
underground or phone lines would cause a problem for a possible development.
7. Main services
All services: mains water supply, foul sewer, electricity and high-speed electronic
communications networks, are on the site of Myrtle Farm right next to the candidate
site. The area is serviced by the local bin collection.
8. Historic Importance
The site is not in a conservation area.
None of surrounding buildings are listed.
No know or apparent feature of heritage of archaeological importance can be found
on the land.
No land infills took place.
The site has not been used for any industrial use or as a waste site.
No coal mining has been taken place on or in close proximity to the site.
9. Landscape and ecology
This site has been used for many years as part of the garden of the existing dwelling.
There is no knowledge of any protected species on or surrounding. However, a full
ecological survey would need to be necessary before any development could take
place.
This sloping site can be seen from the main road and up the valley. It is tucked
behind the existing farm house. New dwellings should be design with the
surrounding residential houses in mind.
Small trees and hedgerows are along parts of the northern, southern and eastern
boundaries. There is no defined boundary to the western side. It runs into the garden
of Myrtle Farm.
No large trees can be found on the site.
10. Settlement - Boundaries
This candidate site lies outside the settlement limits of Carmarthenshire as defined in
the local UDP -GR1. It is surrounded by residential development.
In the last LPDs (December 2014) a surrounding site in close proximity (just 2 fields
along) had been included; T3/6/h6.
Pontyberem is a small town which got all necessary amenities in close proximity.
General hospital 9.5 miles
Secondary school 5 miles
Primary schools, less than ¼ mile
Leisure centers, 9 miles
Town center, ¼ mile
Dentist & GP surgeries, ¼ mile
11. Transport links
The transport links to Carmarthen and Llanelli town are well established and
developed.
train station is in Kidwelly, 8 miles away
bus line is along Llannon Road with the next stop a few hundred meters down
the road.
Carmarthen town 9 miles
Llanelli town 8 miles
A48 motorway link is 9 min away
M4 is reached in 15 min
12. Conclusion
The site is very suitable for 2-3 dwellings. They would be tucked behind the exiting
resident development and can be serviced via the same access point. It should be
seen in a visual and functional connection between the dwelling at Myrtle Farm.
Given that this site is close to the existing dwelling as well as only some hundred
yards from a row of dwellings, along Llannon Road, we cannot see any obvious
adverse effect on the developments in close proximity.
Not enough house developments in Carmarthenshire, has been implemented since
the last LDP was approved, which has led to a shortfall of housing sites in
Carmarthenshire.
Especially in Pontyberem not a lot of sites had been included in the last LDP.
There would not be an increase in traffic given that there used to be a working farm
on this site which would have create a fair amount of movement onto the site.
The existing access can be used to serve the dwelling on the site as well as the new
development.
It is worth emphasising at the outset that the site:
will help sustain the community by providing dwellings in a location that
reinforces the traditional settlement pattern;
is of modest size and is situated adjacent to a proposed residential allocation;
would not result in the loss of any important amenity feature or represent an
unacceptable intrusion into the landscape;
would not give rise to any recognised highway or utility service provision
objections
would fully comply with established planning policies that direct development
to sustainable locations in terms of proximity to urban facilities and a public
transport route.
it is closely related to the main public transport corridors;
the site is conveniently located in terms of schools and other services and
facilities;
the site is not constrained by any significant environmental considerations,
including ecological designations;
it will be contained within existing defendable boundaries and will not give rise
to any harmful precedent for further residential development.
It is felt that there is scope for additional small sites to be identified to receive
residential development, in order to provide further choice.
The inclusion would not create any amenity, highway or utility service provision
difficulty.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.