Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4888
Derbyniwyd: 20/03/2023
Ymatebydd: Kedrick Davies
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
I am writing to object to the deletion of the strategic development area as was defined in the current adopted LDP as T2/2/h1 in Llandeilo.
This is the most logical place to accommodate growth for the town and requires a strategic long term vision as was envisaged in the Planning Brief, 2009:
https://www.sirgar.llyw.cymru/media/1212896/briff-cynllunio-a-datblygu-llandeilo.pdf
The deletion of this strategic vision is a serious failing in the 2018-2033 LDP Revised Deposit.
Include the whole of site T2/2/h1 in the Plan
I refer to the above and in particular the proposals for Llandeilo with regard the area to the north of the town.
In particular I refer to housing allocation SeC16/H1 which is allocated for 27 units plus some affordable.
I am writing to object to the deletion of the strategic development area as was defined in the current adopted LDP as T2/2h1.
This is the most logical place to accommodate growth for the town and requires a strategic long term vision as was envisaged in the :
https://www.sirgar.llyw.cymru/media/1212896/briff-cynllunio-a-datblygu-llandeilo.pdf
The deletion of this strategic vision is a serious failing in the 2018-2033 LDP Revised Deposit.
The “incremental” and I suspect disconnected release of land in this northern area of the town as is apparent by the isolated allocation of SeC16/h1 in the Revised Deposit does not constitute the proper planning of the area and will result in a unsatisfactory form of development out of accord with the Council’s own SPG on Placemaking and Design.
Please acknowledge my submissions on the above and continue to advise me on the evolution of the 2018-2033 Revised Deposit as I would wish to make further representations depending on your responses .
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.