Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4887
Derbyniwyd: 06/04/2023
Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Evans
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Heb nodi
Objection to Policy HOM1 in that housing allocation T2/2/h1 in the current LDP has not been carried forward in it's entirety:
Sole access via the restricted space of the existing Parc Pencrug estate in Llandeilo and its steep hill is inadequate for the reduced size of the housing allocation adjacent to Parc Pencrug.
For the wellbeing of the residents of the existing Parc Pencrug estate and of the residents of the adjacent site a more suitable main access point is needed. And this suggests that the site of the whole of the original Northern Residential Quarter should be included in the LDP in order to allow for the provision of access for vehicles and pedestrians via Rhosmaen Street as proposed in 2009.
Suggests that the whole of the original Northern Residential Quarter Allocation (site T2/2/h1) should be included in the Revised LDP.
Dear Sir
I am writing about the 2nd Deposit Revised LDP with reference to the housing site adjacent to Parc Pencrug, Llandeilo.
Sole access via the restricted space of the existing Parc Pencrug estate and its steep hill is inadequate for the construction of the 27 houses shown in the LDP, also for the amount of traffic that would nowadays be subsequently generated by them . And this would be even more the case for the 86 homes currently being proposed for the site by Pobl
For the wellbeing of the residents of the existing Parc Pencrug estate and of the residents of the adjacent site a more suitable main access point is needed. And this suggests that the site of the whole of the original Northern Residential Quarter should be included in the LDP in order to allow for the provision of access for vehicles and pedestrians via Rhosmaen Street as proposed in 2009.
Yours faithfully
Robert Evans
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.