Gwrthwynebu
Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin
ID sylw: 4726
Derbyniwyd: 01/04/2023
Ymatebydd: Mr David Wyn Jenkins
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Objection to the non-inclusion of candidate site SR/009/001 (and additional area to the NW) within the Revised LDP under Policy HOM1 in Blaenau, Ammanford. The LDP does not meet the needs of Blaenau and there is no scope for any new builds in the area. The site is said to be divorced from Blaenau, but is actually within the 'welcome to Blaenau' sign. We were hoping to build on our land so that my wife could be close to her elderly parents. We looking for a single dwelling, with the possibility of maybe more properties being built in the future, such as Affordable housing to enhance Blaenau.
Allocate site for housing and include within the development limits for Blaenau.
LDP does not meet what is required in Blaenau. There is no scope for any new builds in the area at all. The Canditate Site CA 0080 SR009/001 is said to be divorced from Blaenau, but is actually inside where the sign says welcome to Blaenau. We were hoping to build on our land so that my wife could be close to her elderly parents who live just across the road at 161 Penygroes Road with there health deteriorating as time goes on. The family has owned the land for the last twenty years and are looking for a single dwelling, with the possibility of maybe more properties being built in the future, such as Affordable housing to enhance Blaenau .
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.