Gwrthwynebu

Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin

ID sylw: 4654

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2023

Ymatebydd: ms Nicola Kelly

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Objection to the non-inclusion of land within the Revised LDP under Policy HOM1 for site SR/062/002 in Foelgastell.
The side access to the lane is more than sufficient for any and all of the heavy plant required to keep the land usable.
There are several small holdings that also require machinery to access the lane and planning has been passed for two detached dwellings past my land.
Delivery vehicles use this lane every day, residents orders , post office, Amazon.
Water is already connected to the lane so would cause minimal disruption to be connected.

Newid wedi’i awgrymu gan ymatebydd:

Include above land for housing within the Revised LDP.

Testun llawn:

The side access to the lane is more than sufficient for any and all of the heavy plant required to keep the land usable, clean and tidy. So that isn't an issue either. I actually paid to have the side access made, I can provide invoices and photographs of required.

My land isn't the only land that is on the lane , there are several small holdings that also require machinery to access the lane and have done for a fair few hundred years, long before all the new houses were built on the lane.

I lived for almost 14 years on the lane, only recently having moved as sold my house. So am more aware of the traffic and any and all issues on the lane. There was/is have a supply of available stones supplied by Welsh water, free of charge at the lane entrance. They are there to fill in any holes that mother nature and ALL traffic to and fro on the lane cause. There are huge amount of delivery vehicles on this lane every day, residents orders , post office, Amazon, people who craft from home, their supplies. Very little to my yard in the scheme of things.

And the biggest question of all is this... If this lane is so congested and unable to accommodate any more traffic or buildings, why was planning passed for not one but two detached houses, past where my land is??
W/36873 granted approximately 14/11/2019
W/36324 granted approximately 15/01/2018...

The furthest plot runs eye level to my barn in my yard, so is most definitely visible and well past the lineage of buildings on the lane. Let alone the absolutely massive garage in Awdleg which is right next to my boundry fence in my yard.

The two properties which are directly behind my yard, have not put in ANY objections to a dwelling or any issues with my yard, surely this tells you more than the other's as it backs right onto their homes and gardens!

With regards to waste, over 60% of the lane actually have septic tanks, and solar panels are becoming the normal these days. So electricity wouldn't be an issue. Water is already connected to the lane so would cause minimal disruption to be connected..

My wish is that a small eco friendly, minimal impact home be allowed on my land. Butted pretty much up to the HUGE garrage, so wouldn't overlook anybody, cause no issues with privacy. The land can be utilised as an actual small holding, to sustain the people living there. Grow their own vegetables, some chickens etc totally self sufficient.

A change of use for the stables and barn would also be an option to be considered??

Let's face it our world has gone mad, everything is becoming near impossible. We all want some peace and quiet to just live our life's... I understand things are put in place to stop nonsense happening all over the place. But i really hope you can now see what I am trying to achieve. Not to make a fast buck, but to create a sustainable home.

I am totally out of my depth here, so please excuse my rather old fashioned way of response... If you require me to submit anything please can you let me know. I was shocked to see that it wasn't even included in your plans online.

But what is meant to be will be just that. And hopefully now you will get to see the whole picture from me.

Kindest regards
Nicola Kelly

Atodiadau:


Ein hymateb:

The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.