Second Deposit LDP

Search representations

Results for Barratt David Wilson Homes search

New search New search

Object

Second Deposit LDP

PrC2/h23

Representation ID: 5379

Received: 14/04/2023

Respondent ID: 4879

Respondent: Barratt David Wilson Homes

Agent: Boyer Planning

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

The site is not deliverable during the plan period. It has a number of constraints, is not sustainable in
terms of its location and it is not supported by a robust masterplan.

Attachments:


Our response:

Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.

Object

Second Deposit LDP

PrC2/h10

Representation ID: 5380

Received: 14/04/2023

Respondent ID: 4879

Respondent: Barratt David Wilson Homes

Agent: Boyer Planning

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

BDW objects to the proposed allocation of this site. We have serious concerns regarding its deliverability. The site is a former quarry and is covered by dense vegetation with complicated access arrangements which are affected by Flood Risk Zone C2 constraints. It has not been demonstrated that this site can be accessed without unacceptable flood risk consequences. The site is also
brownfield in nature, and it should be demonstrated that appropriate ground investigation work has been undertaken to demonstrate that the site is viable and deliverable. The site should be removed as a draft allocation from the Deposit Revised LDP.

Attachments:


Our response:

The allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.

A response has been received from NRW relating to important ecological connectivity. Further evidential work will be required for examination, with the matter to be considered further at examination

Object

Second Deposit LDP

PrC2/h22

Representation ID: 5381

Received: 14/04/2023

Respondent ID: 4879

Respondent: Barratt David Wilson Homes

Agent: Boyer Planning

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

BDW objects to the allocation of this site. It comprises an existing allocation within the adopted LDP which is proposed to be ‘rolled’ forward by CCC. There is no evidenced justification for the continued allocation of this site, given that no progress has been made since its first allocation in 2014. The delivery of this site has been pushed back a year in every JHLAS since at least 201, which confirms the lack of progress and deliverability of this site. This site should be removed as a draft allocation from the Deposit Revised LDP.

Attachments:


Our response:

Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.

Object

Second Deposit LDP

SeC5/h2

Representation ID: 5382

Received: 14/04/2023

Respondent ID: 4879

Respondent: Barratt David Wilson Homes

Agent: Boyer Planning

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

BDW objects to a number of proposed allocations owing to concerns in relation to their suitability and
deliverability including SeC5/h2.

The site is constrained, is not viable and is not deliverable within the plan period.

Attachments:


Our response:

Disagree. The site is under construction.

The allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared

Object

Second Deposit LDP

PrC3/h4

Representation ID: 5383

Received: 14/04/2023

Respondent ID: 4879

Respondent: Barratt David Wilson Homes

Agent: Boyer Planning

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

This is an historic allocation and there has been little progress in bringing the site forward for development despite extensive marketing. The site is not deliverable within the Plan period.

Attachments:


Our response:

Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.

Object

Second Deposit LDP

PrC1/MU2

Representation ID: 5384

Received: 14/04/2023

Respondent ID: 4879

Respondent: Barratt David Wilson Homes

Agent: Boyer Planning

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

BDW is concerned that whilst this is a major urban extension to the south of Carmarthen, there is no
confirmation that an end user is in place in the form of a residential developer to deliver the quantum of development proposed within the Plan period. The deliverability of this site is therefore questionable.

Attachments:


Our response:

Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.

Object

Second Deposit LDP

Strategic Policy – SP4: A Sustainable Approach to Providing New Homes

Representation ID: 5385

Received: 14/04/2023

Respondent ID: 4879

Respondent: Barratt David Wilson Homes

Agent: Boyer Planning

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

In addition to the above, BDW Homes wholly object to a number of additional housing allocations which fall within Phosphate Sensitive Catchment Areas. A detailed list of these housing allocations have been provided in Table 1: List of Housing Allocations in Phosphates areas, as well as our detailed response to each of the proposed housing allocation. A number of the sites have been included as housing allocations as they have gained planning permission. We do not agree with the inclusion of these sites as they should be listed as commitments. Similarly, those allocations included as they have a planning application submitted and pending should not be automatically included as an allocation. This is contrary to the tests of soundness, as those allocations being rolled forward within phosphate sensitive areas are currently not suitable nor deliverable owing to NRW phosphorous guidance.
With regards to CCC’s efforts to solve the phosphate issue within the County, investigative work has been undertaken which forms part of the LDP evidence base. From reviewing this work, it is evident that CCC have no agreed mitigation measure to tackle the phosphate issue. A nutrient budget calculator has been constructed which calculates the phosphate levels that a proposed residential development in Carmarthenshire could produce. This is not a mitigation measure and so Carmarthenshire are yet to find a suitable phosphate solution.
In addition, a Nutrient Mitigation Options Technical Review (2022) has been prepared by Ricardo Energy & Environmental, outlining guidance on phosphorous mitigation options for use in Carmarthenshire. Although the report provides a short list and review of possible mitigation options no set option has been agreed upon. The report concludes ‘it is likely that all schemes will require engagement with/by CCC, Natural Resources Wales, the Nutrient Management Board and developers. Other stakeholders like landowners/land managers, Dwr Cymru Welsh Water and environmental NGOs are likely to also have a role in delivery of specific solutions.’
To this end, BDW Homes wholly object to the allocation of sites within Phosphate Catchment areas owing to the County having no established mitigation solution for development in phosphate areas. As such, all housing allocations which fall within phosphate sensitive areas should be discounted from the LDP, as these suits are not suitable nor deliverable. Additional more suitable sites should be sought which are located outside of the phosphate sensitive areas. Land off Heol-y-Mynydd, Bryn is a suitable location for development, being located adjacent to the settlement of Bryn/Llanelli and located outside a phosphate sensitive area.

Attachments:


Our response:

The strategy of the revised LDP seeks to support the distribution of housing and economic growth which is of a scale and nature appropriate to its cluster and has taken into account SAC riverine phosphate constraints. In this respect the revised LDP seeks to ensure that development is appropriate to the settlement and reflective of its ability to accommodate growth and the services and facilities available. As part of a future planning application an applicant will need to satisfy the requirements to reduce phosphate levels associated with their development. The evidence base has been developed to ascertain the position with regards the phosphate affected SACs and will facilitate the delivery of the housing allocations within these areas.

Object

Second Deposit LDP

PrC2/h4

Representation ID: 5937

Received: 14/04/2023

Respondent ID: 4879

Respondent: Barratt David Wilson Homes

Agent: Boyer Planning

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Representation Summary:

No progress of effort has been made to bring the site forward for a prolonged period. The site is not considered to be deliverable within the Plan period.

Attachments:


Our response:

The allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.