Second Deposit LDP

Search representations

Results for Union Tavern Estates search

New search New search

Object

Second Deposit LDP

HOM1: Housing Allocations

Representation ID: 4653

Received: 13/03/2023

Respondent: Union Tavern Estates

Agent: Ceri Davies Planning Ltd

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

Objection to the non-inclusion of land within the Revised LDP under Policy HOM1 for site SR/067/008 in Gorslas:
The site is not within or near any statutory cultural heritage, landscape or ecological designations. There are no technical constraints on the site that cannot be overcome or would preclude residential development. It is sustainably located and there are no pre requisite infrastructural requirements to enable it to be developed. It is located within an area where there has been previous, and is existing demand, for residential development.

Change suggested by respondent:

Allocate above land for housing in the Revised LDP.

Full text:

SR/67/008: Land East of Llandeilo Road, Gorslas – Proposed New Housing Allocation
Candidate Site SR/067/008 continues to be supported by the site promoter. It is considered that the site should form a
housing allocation allocated by way of
Policy HOM1.
The enclosed Deposit LDP Planning Statement and Concept Plan provides further
information on the site’s context and the proposals. The site is not within or near any statutory cultural heritage, landscape or ecological designations. There are no
technical constraints on the site that cannot be overcome or would preclude residential development. The site is sustainably located and there are no prerequisite infrastructural requirements to enable it to be developed. The site is located within an area where there has been previous, and is existing demand, for residential development. It comprises a deliverable site according with the PPW requirement for “the supply of land to meet the housing requirement proposed in a development plan [to] be deliverable”.The submission demonstrates that site is accessible to pedestrians, cyclists and public transport users; a safe and appropriate access, that meets current design standards, can be provided by utilising and widening the existing field access into the candidate site ; and that the development will generate a modest increase in
traffic that is unlikely to have a significant detrimental impact on the operation of, and can be accommodate by, the surrounding highway network

Attachments:


Our response:

The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.