SR/139/001

Object

Representation ID: 2338

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Mudiad Amddiffyn Porthyrhyd

Objections include flooding, loss of privacy, loss of view, increase in surface water, loss of agricultural land, sewerage system pipeline traverses the site, overloading of the sewerage system,

Object

Representation ID: 2340

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Mrs Enfys Davies

Objection includes surface water flooding, and capacity issues with the sewerage network

Object

Representation ID: 2341

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Mrs Betty Matthews

Gwrthwynebiad ynglyn a carthffosiaeth, ac effeithiau llifogydd.

Objections including sewerage and impacts of flooding.

Object

Representation ID: 2344

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: M Jones

Problemau yn cynnwys y system carthffosiaeth

Problems exist which include issues with the sewerage system

Object

Representation ID: 2391

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Mr a Mrs B a K Davies

Gwrthwynebiad - Mae'r cae yn parth llifogydd ac yr effaith all hyn ei gael.

Hefyd mae'r ardrawi ar dai cyfogos a cynyddu traffic cymudo!!

Objection - The site is on a flood plain, which will have an impact on us.

It will impact on neighbouring properties and will increase commuting traffic.

Object

Representation ID: 2763

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Mr Alan Landry

A housing development was proposed of this site approximately 2007 and refused and, whilst the current application refers to a substantial reduction in the number of proposed properties, I believe this will a precursor to further applications resulting in a substantially increased development.

This is known and designated flood plain - one of the reasons for the failure of the 2007 application. Should houses eventually be built in this area, one assumes that some, if not all, will require mortgages. If this is the case, who will supply the insurances against flooding from the adjacent river? It is common knowledge that storm water drainage in the village centre is already under immense pressure due to existing developments on the flood zone and villagers are constantly in fear of flooding due to climate change and, more importantly, possible damage to 2 No water mains, one of which 48" in diameter, which run through the adjacent playing fields.

Schools in the area known to be operating at full capacity and further developments such as SR/139/001 and SR/139/002 in village are going to exacerbate the problem.

Object

Representation ID: 2895

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Megan Bevan

Dymunaf gofrestru fy ngwrthwynebiad i gynnwys SR/139/001 ac SR/139/002 yn y Cynllun Datblygu Lleol Diwygiedig ar gyfer y cyfnod o 2018 ymlaen.
Sail fy ngwrthwynebiad yw bod y tir ar barth llifogydd sydd yn achosi problemau eisoes. Mae cynyddu poblogaeth y pentref heb gynyddu'r isadeiledd yn arwydd o ddiffyg cynllunio.

I wish to register my objection to the inclusion of SR/139/001 and SR/139/002 in the Revised Local Development Plan for the period of 2018 onwards.
The basis of my objection is that the land is on a flood zone that is already causing problems. Increasing the village population without increasing the infrastructure shows a lack of planning.

Object

Representation ID: 2898

Received: 25/01/2019

Respondent: Janet Thomas

Parthed: safleoedd ceisladau cyallunlo SR/139/002 ac SR/139/001 ym Mhorthyrhyd, Caerfyrddin.

Daeth I'm sylw yn ddiweddar fod Adran Cynllunio Cyngor Sir Caerfyrddin yn ystyried safleoedd ym Mhorthyrhyd ar gyfer Codi rhagor o dai. Hoffwn fynegi fy ngwrthwynebiad chwyrn i'r fath ddatblygiad ar sail y canlynol yn unol a'r ddogfen sydd ynghlwm:

Re: sites of planning applications SR/139/002 and SR/139/001 at Porthyrhyd, Carmarthen
It has recently come to my attention that Carmarthenshire County Council's Planning Department is considering sites at Porthyrhyd to build more houses. I would like to express my fierce objection to such a development on the following basis as per attached document:

Object

Representation ID: 3002

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Mr Glan Davies

Ysgrifennaf i gofrestru fy ngwrthwynebiad cryf iawn i gynnwys y ddau safle SR/139/001 ac SR/139/002 yn y cynllun newydd.

Mae fy nghartref i yn un o ddau fyngalo sy'n ffinio â'r cae lle bydd un o'r datblygiadau posib (SR/139/002) - 32 neu fwy o ddai - datblygiad anferth! Rwy'n gwybod nad oes gen i hawl I olygfa nac ychwaith i fwynhau cael cae gwyrdd y tu ôl I'm cartref. Ar hyn o bryd mae'n deimlad braf codi yn y bore ac yn sicr mae'n llesol I iechyd.

Fel un fu'n ffermio rwy'n gwybod pa mor bwysig yw diogelu tir amaeth da. Mae'r ffermwr sy'n rhentu'r cae uchaf hwn yn cael tri chnwd o silwair bob blwyddyn. Byddai datblygu yma yn golygu colli tir amaeth o safon. Rwyn'n gwybod nad ydy'r cae isaf yn dir da o gwbwl ond mae'n gae holl bwysig am reswm arall. I'r cae hwn mae'r holl ddŵr glaw yn llifo o'r ardal gyfagos felly mae'n bwysig fel cae draeniad naturiol. Mae rhannau o'r cae ar "flood zone". Yn aml iawn, fe welir pyllau ar y cae a llawr o ddŵr yn llifo i'r hewl. Beth fydd canlyniad rhagor o goncritio?

I write to register my strong objection to including the two sites SR/139/001 and SR/139/002 in the new scheme.

My home is one of the two bungalows adjoining the field where one of the developments is proposed (SR/139/002) - 32 or more homes - a huge development! I know that I have no right to a view or to enjoy having a green field behind my home. At present, it's a lovely feeling getting up in the morning and it's definitely beneficial to health.

As one who used to farm, I know how important it is to safeguard good agricultural land. The farmer who rents this top field has three crops of silage from it each year. Developing here would mean losing quality agricultural ground. I know that the bottom field is not good ground at all but it is an important field for another reason. All of the rain water flows into this field from the nearby area therefore it is important as a natural drainage field. Parts of the field are on a "flood zone". Very often, pools are seen on the field and lots of water flows onto the road. What will the effect of more concreting be?

Object

Representation ID: 3004

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Mr Aled Rees

Rhesymau pennaf dros wrthwynebu SR/139/001
* Safle o fewn y parth llifogydd!
* Problemau eisioes yn bodoli gyda dŵr glaw a llifogydd o ganlyniad I ddatblygu ar orlifdir
* Effaith ar dai cyfagos.

Main reasons for objecting to SR/139/001
* The site is within a flood zone!
* There are already problems regarding rain water and floods as a result of developing on a flood plain.
* The effect on nearby houses

Object

Representation ID: 3006

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Mr Dylan Williams

Rhesymau pennaf dros wrthwynebu SR/139/001
* Safle o fewn y parth llifogydd!
* Problemau eisioes yn bodoli gyda dŵr glaw a llifogydd o ganlyniad I ddatblygu ar orlifdir
* Effaith ar dai cyfagos.

Main reasons for objecting to SR/139/001
* The site is within a flood zone!
* There are already problems regarding rain water and floods as a result of developing on a flood plain.
* The effect on nearby houses

Object

Representation ID: 3008

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Mrs Carol Willimas

Rhesymau pennaf dros wrthwynebu SR/139/001
* Safle o fewn y parth llifogydd!
* Problemau eisioes yn bodoli gyda dŵr glaw a llifogydd o ganlyniad I ddatblygu ar orlifdir
* Effaith ar dai cyfagos.

Main reasons for objecting to SR/139/001
* The site is within a flood zone!
* There are already problems regarding rain water and floods as a result of developing on a flood plain.
* The effect on nearby houses

Object

Representation ID: 3010

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Mr & Mrs R & A Rhys

Cynlluniau Tai Newydd ym Mhorth-y-rhyd

Gwrthwynebwn godi rhagor o dai yn y pentref gan ei fod yn gorwedd, yn swyddogol, ar barth llifogydd. Nid yw, ymhellach, yn deg denu prynwyr I fuddsoddi mewn tai newydd, nid yn unig oherwydd y problemau annymunol a ddaw yn sgil llifogydd ond hefyd am y bydd yswiriant eu tai yn annerbyniol o uchel.
O ddal ati I ychwaegu'n sylweddol at nifer y tai gan anwybyddu'r ffactorau hyn ein hofn ni yw y bydd ein cartrefi yn y pen draw yn mynd yn ddiwerth am na fydd neb eisiau eu prynu.

New housing developments in Porth-y rhyd

We object to the building of more houses in the village due it being officially within a flood zone. Attracting people to invest in new houses would be unfair, not just due to the undesirable problems regarding floods, but also because their house insurance would be extremely high.
By continuing to build a significant amount of houses and ignoring these issues, we fear that our homes will be worthless in the future due to the fact that no one will want to buy them.

Object

Representation ID: 3012

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Rhian Rees

Rhesymau pennaf dros wrthwynebu SR/139/001
* Safle o fewn y parth llifogydd!
* Problemau eisioes yn bodoli gyda dŵr glaw a llifogydd o ganlyniad i ddatblygu ar orlifdir
* Effaith ar dai cyfagos.

Main reasons for objecting to SR/139/001
* The site is within a flood zone!
* There are already problems regarding rain water and floods as a result of developing on a flood plain.
* The effect on nearby houses

Object

Representation ID: 3030

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: Mr Gerwyn Rhys

Safleoedd: SR/139/001 (Middleton-Bolgoed), SR139/002 (caeau ger Llwyn Henri)

Ysgrifennaf atoch I ddatgan fy ngwrthwynebiad i'r ddau safle uchod a gynigiwyd fel safleoedd posibl yn rhan o CDLI Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfryddin. Ysgrifennais atoch yn flaenorol yn 2012 yn datgan fy ngwrthwynebiad i'r Safleoedd Datblygu Amgen, ac mae llawer o'r un dadleuon yn berthnasol yn yr achos hwn. Carwen ddweud hefyd fod trigolion y pentref wedi cael cryn sioc wrth glywed am y posibilrwydd y gallai rhagor o dai gael eu codi yma. Dyma grynodeb o fy rhesymau dros wrthwynebu'r safleoedd uchod.

I write to express my objection to the two sites offered above as potential sites for Carmarthenshire's Revised Local Development Plan. I previously wrote to express my objection to the Alternative Development Sites in 2012, and many of the same arguments are relevant in this case. I would also like to note that the residents of the village have been shocked by the possibility of more houses being built here. Here is a summary of my reasons for objecting to the above sites.