SR/004/008

Object

Representation ID: 2027

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Stephanie Harries

Basis for Objection:

1. Outside LDP;
2. Green Belt separates Ammanford from Glanamman;
3. Railway track acts as a wildlife corridor attracting wildlife: Butterfly population "check";
4. Traffic is a huge problem on this road;
5. Large sewer runs through field 11 meter exclusion zone;
6. Local schools are full;
7. Local GP's are full;
8. Social Care is on collapse.

The field has mature trees and has been a meadow for decades. It is a natural boundary between Ammanford and Glanamman.

We should not be allowing ribbon development along our main roads.

Object

Representation ID: 2172

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: M.N. Rist

The road is incredibly busy already without exacerbating the problem.

Object

Representation ID: 2173

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Paul Crocker

Site is currently outside LDP and should remain so in the revised LDP.

Object

Representation ID: 2174

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: David Lee & Roger Craddock

For good reasons this is currently outside the LDP and it should remain outside.

Object

Representation ID: 2175

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Mr & Mrs W.D Fairburn

This land has always been outside the LDP and is agricultural land.

Object

Representation ID: 2176

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Mr & Mrs L Pope

We are against the proposed revised local development plan, in particular the site SR/004/008. The area is currently agricultural and should remain so.

The road of the proposed plan is very dangerous and fast - deaths have occurred.

Object

Representation ID: 2177

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Mr Dylan Jones

Myself and my wife object to planning permission to built houses on a field in Pontamman Rd. It would cause more traffic congestion. The disturbance of wildlife, trees, NATURAL HABITAT & hedgerows.

Object

Representation ID: 2178

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Jenny Buchanan

Not acceptable to built on green belt.

A474 already very busy road so extra traffic from new site not safe. Very disruptive while building work is carried out & during & subsequently very unsafe trying to get in & out of drives for existing properties.

Sewerage very old & already used to capacity.

Object

Representation ID: 2179

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Wendy Rees

The this site is currently outside the LDP and should remain so.

This is the only green area between Ammanford & Glanamman.

Object

Representation ID: 2180

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Justin Watson

1. The land is green belt.
2. Currently outside LDP is agricultural land.
3. Concerned about extra traffic on Pontamman Road, there has already been fatalities (deaths) along this road. 8am you cannot get out of your drive due to traffic. Vehicles always speeding & overtaking in 30mph area. Litter always being thrown out of cars.

Object

Representation ID: 2181

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Mr Huw Marshall

SR/004/008 CA0133

I object to this development.

Object

Representation ID: 2182

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Mr Craig Maloney

Should remain as it is.

Object

Representation ID: 2183

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: H Jenkins

SR/004/008 CA0133

I am writing as a Pontamman resident to object strongly to planning application.

Object

Representation ID: 2184

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Mrs M.I George

This is agricultural land and should remain so.

Also, this is the only green space between Ammanford & Glanamman.

N.B I have lived opposite this field for 50 years - the pleasure that it has given myself & my husband is imeasurable!!

Object

Representation ID: 2185

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Mr Neil Thomas

The site is outside the LDP, and is agricultural land on a green belt.

Object

Representation ID: 2186

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Arwel & Menna Davies

Site should remain as green belt as part of the green corridor with distinct separation between the communities of Ammanford and Glanamman.

Should remain as the "green lungs" of the community.

Object

Representation ID: 2187

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Mr Daniel Elfed Thomas

Should remain outside LDP and kept as green belt area.

Object

Representation ID: 2189

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Mrs Corinna Collins

1. Is in the green belt, countryside view would be affected, concerned value of our property could drop.
2. Pontamman Road is fast and fury. In the part few years there have been several accidents including fatalities. Traffic flows generated by residential are of this site would exacerbate that problem.
3. Our water pressure is low, could worsen with additional housing.

Object

Representation ID: 2190

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Mr Ceri Thomas

Concerns regarding the development of this area due to it's impact on local facilities which in many areas are already full to capacity.

Access to the proposed development would also utilise dangerous existing road conditions along this stretch of road.

Identified area outside LDP: Green belt area.

Object

Representation ID: 2191

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Mr J.M Veall

Access to a potential residential area will have an impact on traffic flows on the busy A474 road which has been the site of several accidents, including fatalities, in recent years. To introduce another traffic stream onto this road would be disruptive and potentially dangerous.

Object

Representation ID: 2198

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Mr D E Harries

First and foremost the site is a green belt. It is prime agricultural land. Development should only be allowed when no other land is available, and there is plenty of alternative land available in the area. i.e. Brown field sites

Object

Representation ID: 2202

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Cllr. Colin Evans

Is currently outside the LDP and should remain so in the revised LDP.

Object

Representation ID: 2208

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Mr Anthony Ernest Viney

I bought my house on the understanding the land above and opposite my property was green belt and as such should remain green belt. The area is already struggling to cope with schools overfull, sewers unable to take more and doctors are already overfull and the A474 road could not cope with a development of the size. It would be a total disaster.

Object

Representation ID: 2217

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Mr K Taylor

Currently outside LDP and is in green belt. Therefore should remain so.

Object

Representation ID: 2320

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Mr & Mrs D Owen

Disappointed to find out / day before objections (this form) meant to be submitted. Told it was on social media etc. I don't use social media & I buy the Guardian every week.

I do have a letter box which has worked well over 40yrs. I had a flyer from Iceland today!!

Object

Representation ID: 2322

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Cllr. Colin Evans

Site Ref SR/004/008 is currently out of the LDP and should remain so in the revised LDP.

Object

Representation ID: 2356

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Mr Jason Murphy

Traffic due to new residence would affect the road significantly - speed of travellers is a concern on Pontamman Road and would exacerbate the problem.

Object

Representation ID: 2399

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Pamela Marson

This is a flat and dangerous road extra traffic would be detrimental to the safety of the area. This is surely a green belt and a natural division between Ammanford and Glanamman and an agricultural space - could local amenities cope? Why wasn't this proposal displayed for local residents?