11.375

Yn dangos sylwadau a ffurflenni 1 i 1 o 1

Gwrthwynebu

Ail Gynllun Datblygu Lleol Adneuo Diwygiedig Sir Gaerfyrddin

ID sylw: 5835

Derbyniwyd: 14/04/2023

Respondent ID: 5844

Ymatebydd: Cllr. Hefin Jones

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

• The bar for proving “conclusive evidence of the need for the dwelling” is uniquely high for Rural Enterprise
Dwellings in comparison with other housing categories. The amount of necessary evidence and the years required to
compile data makes such applications prohibitive and is totally out of line with the detail required for an OPD.
• TAN6: 4.1.1 contradicts the lengthy and detailed restrictions placed on individuals and families attempting to
remain in their local community.
• The need to live near a rural enterprise should not be assessed on the employment needs of the enterprise alone.
Families support rural enterprises in many other ways, not only through their employment on the site.
• Families in alternative fields of employment who have strong ties to the site should be encouraged to remain
within their traditional and cultural setting.
CONSIDERATIONS:
1. To bring the requirements of Rural Enterprise Dwellings in line with the requirements of all other housing
requirements – including urban housing and One Planet Development housing.
2. To apply the same test of need for a rural enterprise dwelling as that for a dwelling on a One Planet site.
3. To recognise the potential contribution of Rural Enterprise Dwellings to the sustainability of language, culture and
heritage.
4. To acknowledge that creating an additional dwelling on a rural enterprise site supports the business and family
whether or not the residents are in the employment of the enterprise

Atodiadau:


Ein hymateb:

The requirement for conclusive evidence of the need for a rural enterprise dwelling is not considered to be contrary to Technical Advice Note 6. However, the suitability of the wording and the policy's compatibility with the aims of national policy can be given further consideration at the examination. Some comments relate to the guidance set out in Technical Advice Note 6 and therefore are beyond the remit of the LDP.