Showing comments and forms 1 to 2 of 2

Support

Second Deposit LDP

Representation ID: 4939

Received: 14/04/2023

Respondent ID: 5543

Respondent: Maes Ifan Developments

Agent: Mr T Mabbitt

Representation Summary:

Support for the continued inclusion of allocation PrC3/h6. Supporting documents are submitted.

Change suggested by respondent:

No change to the Plan.

Full text:

Please see the attached:

Representation Form
Supporting Statement
Historic Submissions & Planning History

Attachments:


Our response:

Support welcomed.

Object

Second Deposit LDP

Representation ID: 5368

Received: 14/04/2023

Respondent ID: 3968

Respondent: Mr I Jones

Agent: JCR Planning Ltd

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

This representation comprises an objection to the inclusion of PrC3/h6 as a formal allocation for residential development within the development limits for Betws/Ammanford.
The objection is primarily based on -
1. The viability of the site - there is little evidence to suggest that it will come forward during the plan period.
2. The inadequacy of the highway network in the vicinity of this site - it is a common occurrence for significant levels of vehicle congestion to occur at this location.
3. There are amenity issues associated with the proposed development.

The continued inclusion of PrC3/h6 is blocking and preventing the development of other more appropriate residential schemes in this part of Betws/Ammanford.

Change suggested by respondent:

Remove the site from the Plan

Full text:

This representation comprises an objection to the inclusion of PrC3/h36 and
PrC3/h6 as formal allocations for residential development within the
development limits for Betws/Ammanford.
The objection is primarily based on -
1. The viability of these two sites - there is little evidence to suggest that they
will come forward during the plan period.
2. The inadequacy of the highway network in the vicinity of these sites - it is a
common occurrence for significant levels of vehicle congestion to occur at
these locations.
3. There are amenity issues associated with their proposed development.
The continued inclusion of PrC3/h36 and PrC3/h6 is blocking and preventing
the development of other more appropriate residential schemes in this part of Betws/Ammanford.

Attachments:


Our response:

Disagree, the allocation of the site within the LDP for residential purposes has been subject to full consideration through the site assessment methodology. As part of this assessment process a detailed site pro forma has been prepared.