Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5338
Received: 14/04/2023
Respondent ID: 3941
Respondent: Mrs J Powell
Agent: JCR Planning Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Objects to the exclusion of candidate site SR/164/002 from the development limits for Ystradowen. Its inclusion would not lead to additional environmental pressure, but instead will foster sustainable growth and allow for a wider choice of housing type within this Tier 3 Sustainable Village. The inclusion of this area of previously developed land would be in keeping and in character with the settlement and will ensure a deliverable source of future housing for this sustainable community.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5341
Received: 14/04/2023
Respondent ID: 3968
Respondent: Mr I Jones
Agent: JCR Planning Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
This representation objects to the exclusion of site AS2/004/008 from the development limits for Betws/Ammanford. The site formerly formed part of candidate site SR/004/027. Its inclusion would not lead to additional environmental pressure, but instead will foster sustainable growth and allow for a wider choice of housing type within this Tier 1 Principal Centre. Its development would be in keeping and in character with the settlement and will ensure a deliverable source of future housing for this sustainable community. In addition, residential development at this location:-would not be detrimental to the amenity of adjacent properties; would satisfy recognised housing and sustainability objectives; would not have a detrimental impact on the landscape or nature conservation interests.
There is sufficient and more appropriate land available for residential use within the settlement to accommodate its housing need.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5342
Received: 14/04/2023
Respondent ID: 5746
Respondent: Messrs & T. H. D. & Jones
Number of people: 2
Agent: JCR Planning Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
SR/040/004; CA0839
This representation objects to the exclusion of this site from the development limits for Cwmgwili. Its inclusion would not lead to additional environmental pressure, but instead will foster sustainable growth and allow for a wider choice of housing type within this Tier 3 Sustainable Village. Its development would be in keeping and in character with the settlement and will ensure a deliverable source of future housing for this sustainable community.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5343
Received: 14/04/2023
Respondent ID: 3940
Respondent: Mr T Evans
Agent: JCR Planning Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Objecting to the non inclusion of site AS2/159/006 which forms part of candidate site SR/159/015 (CA0588) Land adjacent Wernos Tip, Tycroes, Ammanford, Carmarthenshire.
This representation objects to the exclusion of this site from the development limits for Tycroes/Ammanford. Its inclusion would not lead to additional environmental pressure, but instead will foster sustainable growth and allow for a wider choice of housing type within this Tier 1 Principal Centre. Its development would be in keeping and in character with the settlement and will ensure a deliverable source of future housing for this sustainable community.
In addition, residential development at this location:-
· would not be detrimental to the amenity of adjacent properties;
· would satisfy recognised housing and sustainability objectives;
· would not have a detrimental impact on the landscape or nature conservation interests.
Furthermore, the site is not impeded by any access, ground condition, flood risk, hydrological, ecological, archaeological or land ownership related constraints and its short term delivery is assured.
The inclusion of this land within the revised development limits should be fully supported.
There is sufficient and more appropriate land available for residential use within the settlement to accommodate its housing need.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5344
Received: 14/04/2023
Respondent ID: 5187
Respondent: Neil Evans
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Yes
Objection to the exclusion of a site for housing in Llanfihangel Ar Arth (AS/088/007):
The site is located on the B4336 and there is direct reasonable access to amenities e.g. education, medical, employment , retail, health and places of worship. The site would provide A much needed sustainably built, environmentally safe, small development low cost housing development aimed at 1st and 2nd time buyers, starter homes, affordable rentals or for downsizing. Utilities companies have indicated that connections are available.
There is sufficient and more appropriate land available for residential use within the settlement to accommodate its housing need.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5348
Received: 14/04/2023
Respondent ID: 5748
Respondent: Elfyn & Menna Thomas
Number of people: 2
Agent: Ceri Davies Planning Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Yes
The representation seeks the inclusion of additional land in the revised Local Development Plan to accommodate potential residential development adjacent to Rhydargaeau (AS2/145/001). The principle of residential development is compliant with both national and local policy and represents an acceptable form of development at this location. The development would assist with the housing land supply situation in the county. While residential development at this location would inevitably change the character of the site itself, the proposed changes would not result in an unacceptable impact on the surrounding landscape nor would they have an adverse impact on the existing neighbouring development, highway network or local infrastructure. In conclusion, it has been demonstrated that there are significant material considerations weighing in favour of the inclusion of this site for residential development in the upcoming revised local development plan.
There is sufficient and more appropriate land available for residential use within the settlement to accommodate its housing need.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5349
Received: 14/04/2023
Respondent ID: 4026
Respondent: Mr R Winterton
Agent: JCR Planning Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
This representation objects to the exclusion of this site (SR/060/002) from the development limits for Ffarmers. Its inclusion would not lead to additional environmental pressure, but instead will foster sustainable growth and allow for a wider choice of housing type within this Tier 3 Sustainable Village. Its development would be in keeping and in character with the settlement, providing a natural ‘rounding off’ opportunity at this central village location, and will ensure a deliverable source of future housing for this sustainable community. In addition, residential development at this location:-
- would not be detrimental to the amenity of adjacent properties;
- would satisfy recognised housing and sustainability objectives;
- would not have a detrimental impact on the landscape or nature conservation interests.
Furthermore, the site is not impeded by any access, ground condition, flood risk, hydrological, ecological, archaeological or land ownership related constraints and its short term delivery is assured.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5350
Received: 14/04/2023
Respondent ID: 4088
Respondent: Mr E Salini
Agent: JCR Planning Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
This representation objects to the exclusion of this site from the development limits for Ammanford (SR/004/036). Its inclusion would not lead to additional environmental pressure, but instead will provide the opportunity for an attractive, appropriate development, thereby fostering sustainable growth and allowing a wider choice of housing type within this Tier 1 Principal Centre. Its development would be in keeping and in character with the settlement and will ensure a deliverable source of future housing for this sustainable community. In addition, residential development at this location:- · would not be detrimental to the amenity of adjacent properties; · would satisfy recognised housing and sustainability objectives; · would not have a detrimental impact on the landscape or nature conservation interests. Furthermore, the site is not impeded by any access, ground condition, flood risk, hydrological, ecological, archaeological or land ownership related constraints and its delivery is assured.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5351
Received: 14/04/2023
Respondent ID: 4097
Respondent: Mr E Davies
Agent: JCR Planning Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
This representation objects to the exclusion of candidate site SR/067/013 from the development limits for Black Lion Road, Cross Hands. Its inclusion would not lead to additional environmental pressure, but instead will foster sustainable growth and allow for a wider choice of housing type within this Tier 1 Principal Centre. Its development would be in keeping and in character with the settlement and will ensure a readily deliverable source of future housing for this sustainable community. The proposed site offers a valuable development option in this part of Cross Hands, where no other allocations have been proposed. The site also bears close resemblance to allocation PrC3/h8 in its form and context and which is deemed an acceptable residential development opportunity. In addition, residential development at this location:-
· would not be detrimental to the amenity of adjacent properties;
· would satisfy recognised housing and sustainability objectives;
· would not have a detrimental impact on the landscape or nature conservation interests.
Furthermore, the site is not impeded by any access, ground condition, flood risk, hydrological, ecological, archaeological or land ownership related constraints and its delivery is assured.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5352
Received: 14/04/2023
Respondent ID: 5749
Respondent: David Rhodri Davies
Agent: Asbri Planning
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Yes
In summary, the landowner objects to Policies SD1 and HOM1 within the Second Deposit Revised Plan.
They object to SD1 as within the adopted LDP, part of the site lies within the settlement boundary of Llanybri and is
allocated for housing. There appears to be no justfication over taking it outside limits. The previous candidate site is
a natural extension of this housing allocation AS2/108/001
There is sufficient and more appropriate land available for residential use within the settlement to accommodate its housing need.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5353
Received: 14/04/2023
Respondent ID: 5749
Respondent: David Rhodri Davies
Agent: Asbri Planning
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
HOM1 - objection to the exclusion of the current LDP allocation SC16/h1 in Llanybri. Efforts have been made to deliver this allocation, with this portion of the site having gained outline planning permission for the erection of 13 dwellings and associated infrastructure work (Ref: PL/00629), and a planning application was submitted in March 2023 concerning full planning permission for the construction of an access road in order to serve those dwellings.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5355
Received: 14/04/2023
Respondent ID: 4979
Respondent: Mr G Morris
Agent: JCR Planning Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
This representation objects to the exclusion of this site from the development limits for Llansteffan (SR/106/002). Its inclusion would not lead to additional environmental pressure, but instead will foster sustainable growth and allow for a wider choice of housing type. Its development would be in keeping and in character with the settlement and will ensure a deliverable source of future housing for this sustainable community. In addition, providing the opportunity for development at this location:-
· would not be detrimental to the amenity of adjacent properties;
· would satisfy recognised housing and sustainability objectives;
· would not have a detrimental impact on the landscape or nature conservation interests.
Furthermore, the site is not impeded by any access, ground condition, flood risk, hydrological, ecological, archaeological or land ownership related constraints and its short term delivery is assured.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5356
Received: 14/04/2023
Respondent ID: 4981
Respondent: Mrs E Humphries
Agent: JCR Planning Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
This representation objects to the exclusion of this site from the development limits for Gorslas/Cross Hands (AS2/067/003). The frontage portion of the site has recently been granted planning permission for residential development and it seems fitting that the rear portion now be allocated. The site offers a valuable development option in this part of Gorslas, where no other allocations are proposed and which is deemed an acceptable residential development opportunity. Its inclusion would not lead to additional environmental pressure, but instead will foster sustainable growth and allow for a wider choice of housing type within this Tier 1 Principal Centre. Its development would be in keeping and in character with the settlement and will ensure a readily deliverable source of future housing for this sustainable community. In addition, residential development at this location:-
· would not be detrimental to the amenity of adjacent properties;
· would satisfy recognised housing and sustainability objectives;
· would not have a detrimental impact on the landscape or nature conservation interests.
Furthermore, the site is not impeded by any access, ground condition, flood risk, hydrological, ecological, archaeological or land ownership related constraints and its short term delivery is assured
There is sufficient and more appropriate land available for residential use within the settlement to accommodate its housing need.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5357
Received: 14/04/2023
Respondent ID: 2312
Respondent: Mr Sion Slaymaker
Agent: JCR Planning Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Objection to the non inclusion of site AS2/090/001 as a housing allocation in Llangadog.
The inclusion of the proposer’s land would not lead to additional environmental pressure, but instead will foster sustainable growth and allow for a wider choice of housing type within this Tier 2 Service Centre. Its development would be in keeping and in character with the settlement and will ensure a deliverable source of future housing for this sustainable community.
In addition, residential development at this location:-
· would not be detrimental to the amenity of adjacent properties;
· would satisfy recognised housing and sustainability objectives;
· would not have a detrimental impact on the landscape or nature conservation interests.
Furthermore, the site is not impeded by any access, ground condition, flood risk, hydrological, ecological, archaeological or land ownership related constraints and its delivery is assured.
There is sufficient and more appropriate land available for residential use within the settlement to accommodate its housing need.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5359
Received: 14/04/2023
Respondent ID: 5751
Respondent: Mr & Mrs P Underwood
Number of people: 2
Agent: JCR Planning Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Land at Greenhill Bungalow, Black Lion Road, Capel Hendre, Ammanford, SA18 3SD (AS2/018/001).
This representation comprises an objection to the exclusion of this site from the development limits for Capel Hendre. The inclusion of the proposer’s land would not lead to additional environmental pressure, but instead will foster sustainable growth and allow for a wider choice of housing type within this Tier 1 Principal Centre. Its development would be in keeping and in character with the settlement and will ensure a readily deliverable source of future housing for this sustainable community.
There is sufficient and more appropriate land available for residential use within the settlement to accommodate its housing need.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5360
Received: 14/04/2023
Respondent ID: 5752
Respondent: Mses H, C, & G Wight, Dudlyke, & Searles
Number of people: 3
Agent: Geraint John Planning Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Objection relating to the omission of current LDP allocation T3/9/h4 in Brynamman from being allocated for housing in the Revised LDP.
It is considered that the site is a highly suitable location for housing, and for inclusion as such within the emerging LDP.
We consider that the site ‘performs’ well against the defined assessment criteria and methodology, with no evident constraints, obstacles, or failings.
The development of the site would not unduly damage the character of the surrounding area, due to the site’s location within an existing residential area and its strong association with the settlement of Brynamman.
The site benefits from a close association and connection with the services and facilities provided within Brynamman, which are situated within convenient walking distance (which would facilitate sustainable growth of the settlement).
The site is wholly deliverable and can realistically come forward within the early years of the Plan period.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5361
Received: 14/04/2023
Respondent ID: 5752
Respondent: Mses H, C, & G Wight, Dudlyke, & Searles
Number of people: 3
Agent: Geraint John Planning Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Objection relating to the omission of candidate site SR/015/004 from being allocated for housing in Brynamman.
It is considered that the site is a highly suitable location for housing, and for inclusion as such within the emerging LDP.
We consider that the site ‘performs’ well against the defined assessment criteria and methodology, with no evident constraints, obstacles, or failings.
The development of the site would not unduly damage the character of the surrounding area, due to the site’s location within an existing residential area and its strong association with the settlement of Brynamman.
The site benefits from a close association and connection with the services and facilities provided within Brynamman, which are situated within convenient walking distance (which would facilitate sustainable growth of the settlement).
The site is wholly deliverable and can realistically come forward within the early years of the Plan period.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5362
Received: 14/04/2023
Respondent ID: 5293
Respondent: Ms S McNeill
Agent: JCR Planning Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
New site.
This representation objects to the exclusion of this site and the existing development opposite from the development limits for the Black Lion Road part of Cross Hands (AS2/067/004). Its inclusion would form a natural ‘rounding off’ to this part of the settlement and would not lead to additional environmental pressure, instead fostering sustainable growth and allowing a wider choice of housing type within this Tier 1 Principal Centre. Its development would be in keeping and in character with the settlement and will ensure a readily deliverable source of future housing for this sustainable community. The proposed site offers a valuable development option in this part of Cross Hands.
There is sufficient and more appropriate land available for residential use within the settlement to accommodate its housing need.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5364
Received: 14/04/2023
Respondent ID: 4025
Respondent: Mr A Thomas
Agent: JCR Planning Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Objection to the non-inclusion of site AS2/042/001 for housing within the village of Cwmifor.
A frontage portion (housing allocation SuV51/h1) has already been identified as being suitable for residential development and has been included within development limits, the remainder of the land holding has however been excluded. The part inclusion of this frontage portion is clearly supported.
The following objection is to the exclusion of the majority part of this site from the development limits for Cwmifor. A detailed planning application was submitted in respect of the objection site and which was to be reported to Planning Committee with a recommendation for approval. However, the day prior to that meeting, the application was held in abeyance, due to the decision of Natural Resources Wales (NRW) to impose phosphate discharge restrictions within the entire Tywi Valley SAC area.
It must be emphasised that the proposed scheme includes a key community benefit. The development of the full site will facilitate the provision of a community car park that will provide benefit to village residents and will ease on-road parking.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5366
Received: 14/04/2023
Respondent ID: 5754
Respondent: Celtic Properties and Developments Ltd.
Agent: Evans Banks Planning Limited
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
This representation objects to the exclusion of site ref. AS2/049/002 (previously candidate site reference SR/049/007) from the development limits for Drefach and seeks to secure the inclusion of an area of land off Heol Blaenhirwaun within the residential development limits for Drefach. Its development is supported by national planning policy.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5369
Received: 14/04/2023
Respondent ID: 4879
Respondent: Barratt David Wilson Homes
Agent: Boyer Planning
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Objection to the omission of the above site as an HOM1 site SR/086/053 in Bynea.
From reviewing the Candidate Site Assessment Table 2023 it appears Candidate Site (SR/086/053), Land off Heol-y-Mynydd, has been filtered out during the stage 2 assessment process, owing to concerns at the over intensification of residential development within the immediate area and that the site will remain outside of the development limits. We wholly object to this decision and perceive the assessment of the site as contrasting information in relation to the site’s constraints
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5386
Received: 14/04/2023
Respondent ID: 3968
Respondent: Mr I Jones
Agent: JCR Planning Ltd
Legally compliant? No
Sound? Not specified
The representation seeks the inclusion of site AS2/004/009 in Betws, Ammanford under policy HOM1. The site comprises part of candidate site SR/004/031 (CA0735). Its development would be in keeping and in character with the settlement and will ensure a deliverable source of future housing for this sustainable community.
There is sufficient and more appropriate land available for residential use within the settlement to accommodate its housing need.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5387
Received: 14/04/2023
Respondent ID: 3968
Respondent: Mr I Jones
Agent: JCR Planning Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
This representation objects to the exclusion of this site from the development limits for Betws/Ammanford (AS2/004/010). Its inclusion would not lead to additional environmental pressure, but instead will foster sustainable growth and allow for a wider choice of housing type within this Tier 1 Principal Centre. Its development would be in keeping and in character with the settlement and will ensure a deliverable source of future housing for this sustainable community.
There is sufficient and more appropriate land available for residential use within the settlement to accommodate its housing need.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5388
Received: 14/04/2023
Respondent ID: 5756
Respondent: Messrs D. & P. Sims & Cromwell
Agent: JCR Planning Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Objection to the non-inclusion of candidate site SR/135/003 for housing within the village of Pontargothi.
The inclusion of the site within the development limits for Pontargothi would not lead to additional environmental pressure, but instead could lead to the fostering of sustainable growth and allow for a wider choice of housing type.
The development of the site would be in keeping and in character with the existing pattern of development and would reflect the more recent built form of the settlement.
The site also lies in close proximity to the services and facilities of the village centre and benefits from regular public transport links with nearby settlements.
The development of the site will ensure a deliverable source of future housing for this sustainable settlement.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5391
Received: 24/03/2023
Respondent ID: 5757
Respondent: Gerald Blain Associates
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Objects to Policy HOM1 seeks to include candidate site SR/150/021 in St Clears citing that the site consists of gently sloping agricultural pasture land situated adjacent to the existing LDP boundary. The site has good access from the main B4299 and good visibility splays for a development of this size. All utilities and services are close at hand and have capacity for a development of this size. The site does not have any adverse ground conditions that may obstruct
development. The site currently has a natural hedge bank boundary and it is not envisaged that any works will be required to the boundaries. They are not aware of any protected trees or wildlife within the site.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5392
Received: 11/04/2023
Respondent ID: 2770
Respondent: David Tudor Davies
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Objection to the non-allocation of candidate site SR/086/007 [in Bynea] for housing under Policy HOM1:
The site lies adjacent to housing allocation PrC2/h19 (developed by Persimmon). There is no doubt that when developing the site, Persimmon gained a good understanding of the demands and technical issues involved. Should they develop the adjacent site [SR/086/007], they would be advantaged. Ground surveys carried out in the past seem to suggest there is much similarity between the one site and the continuation of the other. Furthermore, Persimmon already have the advantage of dealing with the issue of surface and foul water management at the developed site.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5393
Received: 24/03/2023
Respondent ID: 5757
Respondent: Gerald Blain Associates
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Objects to Policy HOM1 seeks to include candidate site SR/150/015, citing that the site consists of gently sloping agricultural pasture land situated adjacent to the existing LDP boundary. The site has good access from the main B4299 and good visibility splays for a development of this size. All utilities and services are close at hand and have capacity for a development of this size. The site does not have any adverse ground conditions that may obstruct development. The site currently has a natural hedge bank boundary and it is not envisaged that any works will be required to the boundaries. They are not aware of any protected trees or wildlife within the site
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5394
Received: 24/03/2023
Respondent ID: 5757
Respondent: Gerald Blain Associates
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Objects to Policy HOM1 seeks to include candidate site SR/150/016 in St Clears citing that the site consists of gently sloping agricultural pasture land situated adjacent to the existing LDP boundary. The site has good access from the main B4299 and good visibility splays for a development of this size. All utilities and services are close at hand and have capacity for a development of this size. The site does not have any adverse ground conditions that may obstruct development. The site currently has a natural hedge bank boundary and it is not envisaged that any works will be required to the boundaries. They are not aware of any protected trees or wildlife within the site.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5407
Received: 14/04/2023
Respondent ID: 2862
Respondent: Dafydd & Rhodri Moses
Number of people: 2
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Objection to the exclusion of site AS2/015/002 for housing in Brynamman.
Request for the change to development limits to include the identified field at Caenewydd Farm, off Arfryn Estate, Mountain Road, Upper Brynamman, Ammanford. Refer to enclosed map.
There is sufficient and more appropriate land available for residential use within the settlement to accommodate its housing need.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5412
Received: 11/04/2023
Respondent ID: 5776
Respondent: Eirian Thomas
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Yes
The representation objects to the non allocation of candidate site ref SR/067/007 on Black Lion Road, Gorslas. Its inclusion would assist in meeting a shortfall of housing land and will serve to round off this part of the settlement.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.