Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 4880
Received: 21/03/2023
Respondent ID: 4813
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Mark & Paula Lewis
Number of people: 2
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
HOM1 – object – seeks inclusion of T3/5/h2 in Pontyates.
The Site Assessment Methodology (Sept 2019) section 2a sets out the criteria that has to be met before moving to stage 2b. After reviewing the questions set out in this document, we believe that the proposed land does pass this stage such as:
• Accommodate more than 5 dwellings
• Accessible from 2 public highways
• Physically, functionally and visually linked to the settlement
• Close to Public Transport (Lime Grove Bus Stop)
• Water and sewerage connections are already in place
• Easy access with a road already in place
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 4887
Received: 06/04/2023
Respondent ID: 5580
Respondent: Mr Robert Evans
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Objection to Policy HOM1 in that housing allocation T2/2/h1 in the current LDP has not been carried forward in it's entirety:
Sole access via the restricted space of the existing Parc Pencrug estate in Llandeilo and its steep hill is inadequate for the reduced size of the housing allocation adjacent to Parc Pencrug.
For the wellbeing of the residents of the existing Parc Pencrug estate and of the residents of the adjacent site a more suitable main access point is needed. And this suggests that the site of the whole of the original Northern Residential Quarter should be included in the LDP in order to allow for the provision of access for vehicles and pedestrians via Rhosmaen Street as proposed in 2009.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 4888
Received: 20/03/2023
Respondent ID: 852
Respondent: Kedrick Davies
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
I am writing to object to the deletion of the strategic development area as was defined in the current adopted LDP as T2/2/h1 in Llandeilo.
This is the most logical place to accommodate growth for the town and requires a strategic long term vision as was envisaged in the Planning Brief, 2009:
https://www.sirgar.llyw.cymru/media/1212896/briff-cynllunio-a-datblygu-llandeilo.pdf
The deletion of this strategic vision is a serious failing in the 2018-2033 LDP Revised Deposit.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 4899
Received: 10/04/2023
Respondent ID: 859
Respondent: West Wales Developments Ltd
Number of people: 2
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Seeks the inclusion of site SR/149/008 as a housing site in Saron, Ammanford. Previously, planning has been refused on the grounds that ‘Inclusion of the site would result in an illogical extension to the settlement limits’ but due to the recent development of Parc Y Mynydd we believe it would serve as a continuation of housing for the local area. In support of the site's inclusion the representation notes that there is a shortage of housing in the area, limited housing opportunities for first time buyers, a lack of small scale development and self-build plots.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 4903
Received: 13/04/2023
Respondent ID: 5597
Respondent: Mr Richard Lewis
Agent: JMS Planning & Development Ltd
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? Yes
We object to the omission of site SR/040/002 - Land at Blaengwili off Heol y Deri in Cwmgwili for residential development. The development provides a perfectly logical extension of the urban form within close proximity to all services and located within a sustainable location.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 4904
Received: 10/04/2023
Respondent ID: 859
Respondent: West Wales Developments Ltd
Number of people: 2
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Seeks the inclusion of site SR/132/003 in Penygroes. Previously, planning has been refused on the grounds ‘Inclusion of the site would result in an illogical extension to the settlement limits’ but due to recent and continuing planning consent on the old sawmill land (Cwrt Y Ffynnon), we believe it would serve as a continuation of housing for the local area.
Insufficient allocations have been given to new builds in the area and the county as a whole for the following reasons:
1. Estate agents state a serious shortage of domestic property for sale.
2. CCC company purchases any new first time buyer housing stock which has impacted on opportunities for first time buyers.
3. A lack of small scale development sites or self build plots.
4. The emphasis on large development sitesmakes for inferior housing stock in the area for the future.
5. The emphasis on social housing, where there is often not the demand from local people.
6. The eco houses recently built in the area are not a suitable or in-keeping with the surrounding housing environment and are not built to last.
We believe that there is much scope for improvement of the current LDP to include sites such as ours, to build quality housing for our community.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 4927
Received: 03/04/2023
Respondent ID: 2924
Respondent: Mr Clive Douch
Agent: Nicole Jones
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
The representation seeks the inclusion of the rear part of the property called Myrtlebury Farm at Llannon Road, B4306 on the South edge of Pontyberem (candidate site ref: SR/138/004). Amongst other reasons in support of its inclusion the representation notes that the site would help sustain the community; be of modest size; not negatively impact amenity or landscape; and, would not give rise to any highway or utility objections.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 4928
Received: 03/04/2023
Respondent ID: 2924
Respondent: Mr Clive Douch
Agent: Nicole Jones
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
The representation seeks the inclusion of a field at the rear of Llannon Road, Pontyberem (B4306) (ref: SR/138/006) in the new Local Development Plan. It can be found behind an area of land which has been included the last LDP of a lane serving the Gwendraeth Row development. Amongst other reasons given in support of its inclusion the representation notes that the site would help sustain the community; be of modest size; not negatively impact amenity or landscape; and, would not give rise to any highway or utility objections.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 4940
Received: 03/04/2023
Respondent ID: 2924
Respondent: Mr Clive Douch
Agent: Nicole Jones
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
The representation seeks the inclusion of a field along Llannon Road, Pontyberem (B4306) (candidate site ref: SR/138/005), next to the existing row of street fronted dwellings. Amongst other reasons given in support of its inclusion the representation notes that the site would help sustain the community; be of modest size; not negatively impact amenity or landscape; and, would not give rise to any highway or utility objections.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 4941
Received: 03/04/2023
Respondent ID: 2924
Respondent: Mr Clive Douch
Agent: Nicole Jones
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
The representation seeks the inclusion of a field to the south of the centre of Pontyberem in the new Local Development Plan (candidate site ref. SR/138/009). This parcel of land is north of Gwendraeth Row with direct access. Amongst other reasons given in support of its inclusion the representation notes that the site would help sustain the community; be of modest size; not negatively impact amenity or landscape; and, would not give rise to any highway or utility objections.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 4942
Received: 03/04/2023
Respondent ID: 2924
Respondent: Mr Clive Douch
Agent: Nicole Jones
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
The representation seeks the inclusion of a field right in the centre of Pontyberem in the new Local Development Plan (candidate site ref. SR/138/007). It can be found east of Llannon Road and behind the line of street development to the south of Coalbrook Road. Amongst other reasons given in support of its inclusion the representation notes that the site would help sustain the community; be of modest size; not negatively impact amenity or landscape; and, would not give rise to any highway or utility objections.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 4943
Received: 03/04/2023
Respondent ID: 2924
Respondent: Mr Clive Douch
Agent: Nicole Jones
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
The representation seeks the inclusion of a field in the centre of Pontyberem in the new Local Development Plan (candidate site ref. SR/138/008). This parcel of land is linked to a field in the last LDP. Amongst other reasons given in support of its inclusion the representation notes that the site would help sustain the community; be of modest size; not negatively impact amenity or landscape; and, would not give rise to any highway or utility objections.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 4944
Received: 03/04/2023
Respondent ID: 2924
Respondent: Mr Clive Douch
Agent: Nicole Jones
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
We would like to put a field forward to be kept in the new LDP in Pontyberem. The existing number is T3/6/h5. The owner is in the process of getting outline planning granted on this site.
It is located right in the centre of Pontyberem. This parcel of land has been put in for outline planning last year and application process is going forward.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 4953
Received: 14/04/2023
Respondent ID: 2620
Respondent: John Price
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Dydw i ddim yn teimlo bod y sir wedi gwneud digon o ymdrech i ddiogelu’r iaith Cymraeg. Wrth edrych ar y data o’r proffil oedran trigolion sy'n siarad Cymraeg sy’n symud allan o’r sir a ddim yn dod 'nôl. Mae’r cynllun rwy’n rhoi o flaen y sir heddiw yn gwneud cyfraniad sylweddol i wella’r sefyllfa er mwyn diogelu’r iaith i’r genhedlaeth nesaf. Mae safle yn cael ei gyflwyno ar gyfer defnydd preswyl arfaethedig yng Ngorslas yn y CDLl (SR/067/001).
I don't feel that the County has made enough effort to protect the Welsh language. Looking at the age profile data of residents that speak Welsh that are moving out of the County that don't return. The plan I am putting before the County today makes a important contribution to improve the situation to protect the language for the next generation. A site is put forward for proposed residential use in the LDP in Gorslas (SR/067/001).
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5001
Received: 06/04/2023
Respondent ID: 3410
Respondent: Persimmon Homes West Wales
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Persimmon Homes are promoting the inclusion of sites SR/067/002 in Gorslas.
It is considered that the future development of the residential site at Gorslas which has been submitted as a Candidate Site would be coherent and consistent with the Local Development Plan vision, objectives, preferred strategy and Deposit Plan Policies.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5002
Received: 06/04/2023
Respondent ID: 3410
Respondent: Persimmon Homes West Wales
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Persimmon Homes are promoting the inclusion of site SR/069/003 in Fforest (Options 1 & 2) in the Deposit Plan.
It is considered that the future development of the residential site at Fforest which has been submitted as a Candidate Site would be coherent and consistent with the Local Development Plan vision, objectives, preferred strategy and Deposit Plan Policies.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Support
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5022
Received: 06/04/2023
Respondent ID: 5635
Respondent: William Harold Jones
Support for the removal of housing allocation T3/8/h1 in Glanamman (in the current LDP) from the Revised LDP. The following reasons are given:
The site is unsuitable for housing for a number of reasons, including recorded subsidence issues in the immediate vicinity associated with the coal mining past. The site has a high ecological value. The surrounding road network is also a concern – the highway is already at high capacity and there is an extensive history of minor traffic collisions in the area.
Support welcomed.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5023
Received: 07/04/2023
Respondent ID: 2931
Respondent: Mr & Mrs O'Shea
Number of people: 2
Agent: Mr John Davis
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
This proposed site (SR/148/001) in Saron, Llangeler is similar in environs context to housing allocations SuV33/h1 & SuV35/h1 as a green field site opposite existing dwellings with the exception of being closer to amenities. Within Tier 3 - Sustainable Villages - Cluster 4 of the Second Deposit Revised LDP there are 11 new units within this plan area to date and this amount of housing allocation is unlikely to satisfy the need for housing for the local community. Evidence within this assessment demonstrates this candidate site is within an existing sustainable settlement area, it meets all sustainable requirements as set out within the Planning Policy Wales framework for homes to be constructed within an existing sustainable built environment and community. Development of the site would not have a detrimental impact on the character and setting of the settlement.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5034
Received: 09/04/2023
Respondent ID: 5644
Respondent: Richard Thomas Bowen
Agent: Nicole Jones
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Objection to Policy HOM1 seeking the inclusion of a new site (AS2/065/001) in Glandy Cross. The respondent cites all the reasons why they think the site should be included in the Plan, such as good transport links, access and lack of flooding concerns. As well as shortage of housing in the local area.
There is sufficient and more appropriate land available for residential use within the settlement to accommodate its housing need.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5046
Received: 11/04/2023
Respondent ID: 5153
Respondent: Mr A Pritchard
Agent: Evans Banks Planning Limited
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Objection to Policy HOM1 in regard to the non allocation of candidate site SR/082/005:
The Alternative Site is well related to the existing defined Development Limits for Llandybie and the settlement’s built form as a whole when existing residential development directly to its south and east is taken into consideration. Its position and proposed use therefore represent a natural and logical location for the settlement’s expansion, as well as an example of natural rounding-off of the existing built form. The Site is within walking distance of a number of community facilities and local services, including Primary School, Village Hall, Places of Worship and Public Houses.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5052
Received: 11/04/2023
Respondent ID: 5652
Respondent: Mr M Jay
Agent: Evans Banks Planning Limited
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Objection to Policy HOM1 in regard to the non allocation of a site within Foelgastell: The Alternative Site (AS2/062/001) is well related to the existing defined Development Limits for Foelgastell and the settlement’s built form as a whole with existing residential development directly to its north west and to its south east. Its position and proposed use therefore represent a natural and logical location for the settlement’s expansion.
As well as the community facilities and local services of Foelgastell itself, the site is in close proximity to the larger wider conurbation of Cross Hands and its outlying settlements to the south east.
There is sufficient and more appropriate land available for residential use within the settlement to accommodate its housing need.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5054
Received: 11/04/2023
Respondent ID: 5653
Respondent: Davies Richards Developers
Agent: Evans Banks Planning Limited
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
The representation seeks the inclusion of land previously submitted as a candidate site (ref SR/004/022) for future residential development within the settlement of Ammanford/Betws. The Candidate Site comprised of a single existing enclosure and an associated residential property with all boundaries clearly and well defined. The site is within close proximity to a range of community facilities and local services.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5060
Received: 10/04/2023
Respondent ID: 5657
Respondent: Geraint Davies
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Originally requesting an employment site in Carmarthen, following further consideration and discussions with others residential use is now proposed. The site was included in the adopted LDP and also in the 1st Deposit LDP (AS2/021/006).
The submission documents provide a comprehensive case for the allocation of this land for residential development purposes.
This site could meet some of the housing need around Carmarthen, particularly as it seems to fit in with the planning requirements of the council as well as Planning Policy Wales. The Site adjoins the existing settlement form of Carmarthen and would have no negative environmental factors, no effect on any surrounding developments as it is an isolated site. Access is suitable with good visibility.
In terms of access, it already possesses a highways standard road on the western side of the site for approximately 70 meters. This access road is approached from the quiet B4312 Llysonnen Road with excellent visibility in both directions.
There is sufficient and more appropriate land available for residential use within the settlement to accommodate its housing need.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5061
Received: 11/04/2023
Respondent ID: 5653
Respondent: Davies Richards Developers
Agent: Evans Banks Planning Limited
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Objection to Policy HOM1 in regard to the non allocation of candidate site (SR/082/012) within Llandybie:
The site would serve the settlement of Llandybie and the surrounding area of the associated Principal Centre (Cluster 3). The Site comprises of a series of existing enclosures, with vehicular access gained directly off Blaneau Road, which runs along its northern boundary. From a locational perspective, the site is also within close proximity to the range of community facilities and local services the adjoining settlement and surrounding area has to offer, as well as being in close proximity to a number of well served bus stops that provide access to those services and facilities found in the wider region.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5063
Received: 11/04/2023
Respondent ID: 3925
Respondent: Mr & Mrs D Rourke
Number of people: 2
Agent: Evans Banks Planning Limited
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
The Representation seeks the inclusion of a site previously proposed as a candidate site (ref. SR/132/008) in Penygroes for future residential development. The site is within close proximity of the range of community facilities and local services the settlement has to offer and adjoins a site previously developed by the site proponent.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5065
Received: 12/04/2023
Respondent ID: 3692
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Evans
Number of people: 2
Agent: Aled Thomas Planning Design Ltd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Object to the non-inclusion of the candidate site SR/083/002 in Llandyfaelog.
This site is believed to be a perfect site for inclusion within the Local Development Plan to allow for further residential properties within the locality for local people.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5066
Received: 11/04/2023
Respondent ID: 5659
Respondent: Mr R Owen
Number of people: 2
Agent: Evans Banks Planning Limited
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Objection to Policy HOM1 in regard to the non allocation of candidate site SR/018/002 in Capel Hendre:
The allocation of this site would be in line with established planning principles (i.e. not lead to the coalescence of settlements) and be consistent with it and the assessment approach of the Council in relation to proposed allocations. On the basis of the above, we consider the sites exclusion to be an illogical and erroneous decision by the Council and consider therefore that the LDP as it stands is “unsound” and fails to meet the required Tests of Soundness.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5070
Received: 11/04/2023
Respondent ID: 3627
Respondent: Mr C Jenkins
Agent: Evans Banks Planning Limited
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Objection to Policy HOM1 in regard to the non allocation of candidate site (SR/159/006) within Tycroes:
The western half of the original Candidate Site is allocated for residential development (37 units). The Council have provided no explanation for the removal of the eastern half of the Site from the allocation, or its reduction from 62 units to 37 units. They have raised no highway, ecological, utility or viability reason for its exclusion. This is not only illogical, but also appears to be a dangerous and erroneous decision to make, particularly in light of the level of under provision of deliverable housing sites within the Plan. We consider therefore that all the land edged red in Plan A in the supporting statement should be allocated for residential development under the provision of Policy HOM1 of the Revised LDP.
The sites have been duly considered in the formulation and preparation of the LDP with the reasons for their non-inclusion set out within the Site Assessment Table. The representations raise no additional points which justify inclusion of the suggested sites. The assessment of sites was undertaken in accordance with national guidance and the site assessment methodology and background/topic papers and the supporting evidence.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5072
Received: 11/04/2023
Respondent ID: 5660
Respondent: Mrs K Fakes, Mr D James, Mr E Roberts and Mr G Jones
Number of people: 4
Agent: Evans Banks Planning Limited
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Objection to Policy HOM1 in regard to the non allocation of a site within Penygroes (AS2/132/003):
A small part of the Site lies within the existing defined Development Limits, with the remainder in essence being almost completely encapsulated by them. Its position and proposed use therefore represents a natural and logical location for the settlement’s expansion. The Site is located a short distance from the settlement’s core and within walking distance of all of its community facilities and local services. Access to further facilities in the larger towns of Ammanford, Llanelli and Cross Hands can then be gained by regular bus services.
There is sufficient and more appropriate land available for residential use within the settlement to accommodate its housing need.
Object
Second Deposit LDP
Representation ID: 5075
Received: 11/04/2023
Respondent ID: 5661
Respondent: Omnicorp Ltd
Agent: Evans Banks Planning Limited
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Objection to Policy HOM1 (AS2/021/001) in regard to the non allocation of a site in Carmarthen:
The Alternative Site forms a logical extension to an existing settlement, being well related to it and being positioned at a location within the wider landscape to not form a prominent or logical part of the surrounding open countryside. In addition, the site lies within close proximity and walking distance of the existing community services and local facilities of the adjoining settlement, which will ensure it makes a positive contribution to both national and local sustainable development objectives. From a wider sense, the Site will also benefit from well served excellent public transport links to the adjoining larger town of Carmarthen, together with other locations within and adjoining the County.
There is sufficient and more appropriate land available for residential use within the settlement to accommodate its housing need.