SR/112/002

Object

Representation ID: 446

Received: 03/02/2019

Respondent: mrs adele Bennett

Objection to the candidate sites for Meidrim. The cost to the authority is too great considering improvements to the infrastructure that are necessary. Brown Field sites must be explored as infrastructure, resources and facilities are already exist. The Green Belt, its wildlife and natural habitat needs protecting. Air quality needs safeguarding. Once development starts it is difficult to holt progress. Education, employment and health care are limited in this area. The authority is striving to make difficult target cuts to budgets, Justification for development would be more cost effective and better suited to sites that could easily accommodate housing projects.

Comment

Representation ID: 568

Received: 04/02/2019

Respondent: Mr. Gwynfor Price

Bydd mynedfa i'r safle hwn yn broblem.

Object

Representation ID: 830

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Mrs janice Lovecy

Representation ID 807
I have also made a comment about SR/112/001. However, I am objection to this and SR/112/003. The old development plan to use Council land in the center of the village would be a better option. This scheme has caused concern with the villagers ,where they fear that the value of their homes would be affected. I would have no objection to the old development plan being reinstated

Object

Representation ID: 1193

Received: 07/02/2019

Respondent: mr david summers

The proposed development in such a small village with poor infrastructure and lack of safe approach roads in all directions, sewerage, communication and lack of facilities e.g. shops, insufficient school places and an extra burden on the provision of medical services which are 3 1/2 miles away and already overloaded.
The village already suffers with traffic problems which have been highlighted by the use of traffic calming. The very narrow bridge over the Afon Dewi Mawr which is alongside a well established children's playground would become more dangerous

Object

Representation ID: 1401

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Mrs Barbara Bennett

As a resident of Meidrim my objections as I feel the village will not sustain the development. There are no employment opportunities, little in regards public transportation, a primary school with no head teacher of its own, very few recreation facilities and for those seeking to shop or undertake daily living tasks need to access them via inadequate roads but that is the choice for people who move to rural areas. This was my choice to reside in the beautiful, unspoilt strong welsh speaking community. I am confident that a development would spoil the character and community of the village

Object

Representation ID: 1408

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Mr Frank Bennett

As a resident of Meidrim I am opposed to the candidate sites for the following reasons
The increase in the number of houses would have a negative impact on the character of the village and could damage the welsh culture that exists.
The development would massively involve an expensive upgrade of infrastructure such as the widening of rural narrow lanes, drainage, sewage, lighting, policing, health care, education. There is no gas in the village and no mobile signal with poor internet services.
The environmental cost of losing more green belt land that is irreplaceable

Object

Representation ID: 1432

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Mr Huw Bennett

As A new resident to Meidrim I strongly oppose the development. It's my choice and right to reside in a rural village that boasts character with a strong welsh cultural community. After the developers have left Im afraid what the lasting legacy to the area will hold. Council cuts will inevitable have an impact, roads and furnishings will need to be maintained, policing and health care will need to be increased. Public transport and services will need to be more accessible. Loss of open green space is unforgivable, money would be better spent encouraging young people to enter into agriculture.

Comment

Representation ID: 1436

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Mr E Jones

Sites without access to main highway and the necessary infrastructure should not be included in the LDP. Existing developments with vacant building plots should be finalised before further development land is allocated. Affordable housing must be given the highest priority within rural communities. It is the younger generation who will be the future of such communities. Executive housing, built solely to maximise profit will not sustain communities.

Support

Representation ID: 1466

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Mr Ross Gallie

As I am keen to see the local Meidrem school to remain, be supported and grow then growing the local village makes sense.