SR/086/073

Object

Representation ID: 898

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Mrs Rita Morgan

The roads in the area are not able to support an increase in traffic, the same applies to our schools, Doctor's surgeries and drainage systems.
Also the environmental consequences; the destruction of beautiful green space and damage to wildlife. There are brown/derelict sites in the County which need improving and could be used. The health implications on residents of increased traffic through our villages. I feel the need for extra housing is not in our area but in other parts of the Country, many houses are taking so long to be sold, this does not reflect a housing shortage here.

Object

Representation ID: 1334

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Llangennech Community Council

For reasons previously given.

Object

Representation ID: 1348

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Llangennech Community Council

For reasons given previously.

Object

Representation ID: 1424

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: MR ANDREW WILLIAMS

We object because: -

Right to Light: - building behind will reduce the amount of light as we are 40 ft lower than field. This will have a detrimental effect on our health and wellbeing.

Bank concerns: - over past 10 years bank has deteriorated and fallen into our garden and will pose a concern if large vehicles and houses are built.

Privacy: - We will be over looked and will have no privacy to the back of our property and garden.

Drainage: - Water drainage is a huge concern.

Other concerns: - wildlife

Object

Representation ID: 1913

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Mr Andrew Williams

Object on the following grounds -

Right to light, Banking concerns, privacy and drainage

Llangennech is already over populated and both the schools and roads cannot cope. We are also concerned about the wildlife and the effects on the landscape. Developers have no concerns for wildlife or residents and will simply knock up poor quality houses with limited parking as we have seen in the recent development in Bryn.

Object

Representation ID: 2124

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Mr Phillip Pengelly

The respondent states that development would compromise privacy and the integrity of a wall.

Object

Representation ID: 2419

Received: 06/02/2019

Respondent: Mrs Anne Mathias

The respondent sets out a range of concerns in relation to the proposed candidate site(s). The concerns listed include transport / traffic - including capacity concerns towards the M4 junction, along with concerns at capacity of local education and health provision. There is also reference to concerns with regards to problems with water drainage.

Object

Representation ID: 2751

Received: 08/02/2019

Respondent: Mr & Mrs D Jenkins

Parcels of land are back and side of my property, I would loose value on my property. We would have loss of direct sunlight especially at winter when sun is lower, we would loose privacy. We would feel traffic vibrations in our house, noise and disturbance also pollution from the fumes from passing vehicles, 5 foot difference in levels of where potential access to the land is.

We would be over looked, and loose total privacy directly at the back of the house and garden. Water drainage is not sufficient, as I am still currently having the water over flow coming into my property.

This would have a huge impact on the wildlife here.